ROANOKE TIMES

                         Roanoke Times
                 Copyright (c) 1995, Landmark Communications, Inc.

DATE: SATURDAY, October 21, 1995                   TAG: 9510230121
SECTION: NATIONAL/INTERNATIONAL                    PAGE: NATL/INTL   EDITION: METRO 
SOURCE: Associated Press
DATELINE: CHICAGO                                LENGTH: Medium


EX-WIFE GETS HALF OF NOBEL

SEVEN YEARS AGO, she used her head in the divorce agreement. Now she'll be $500,000 richer.

Robert E. Lucas, winner of the Nobel economics award for his work on the theory of ``rational expectations,'' has to split the $1 million prize with his ex-wife, who seven years ago had her divorce lawyer insert a clause to cover just such a possibility.

The clause in the couple's property settlement reads: ``Wife shall receive 50 percent of any Nobel Prize.''

Lucas, a 58-year-old University of Chicago economist, said he would gladly share his windfall. He is to receive the prize Dec. 10 in Stockholm.

``A deal is a deal,'' he said. ``It's hard to be unpleasant after winning a prize like that.''

Lucas did his groundbreaking work two decades ago. It is now a fundamental part of economic theory.

Rita C. Lucas, 55, had more than just foresight; she had luck. Under the property settlement, if her ex-husband had won the Nobel after Oct. 31, 1995, he would have kept the whole thing. As it turned out, Lucas was awarded the prize on Oct. 10.

Rita Lucas' request for the Nobel clause wasn't entirely fanciful. Eight University of Chicago professors have won the Nobel in economics; Lucas was the fifth in the past six years.

Reached in Chicago on Friday, she declined to discuss her good fortune.

Lucas won for demonstrating how people's fears and expectations can frustrate policymakers' efforts to fine-tune the economy. For instance, attempts to regulate unemployment and investment through the money supply often are undermined by the way people adjust their spending decisions.

For generations, economists had believed that fine-tuning the economy was a matter of pushing the right fiscal and monetary levers. The human factor was given short shrift.



 by CNB