| Type of Document |
Dissertation |
| Author |
Maiga, Alpha S.
|
| URN |
etd-02022007-133634 |
| Title |
An economic analysis of nitrogen fertilization regimes in Virginia |
| Degree |
PhD |
| Department |
Agricultural Economics |
| Advisory Committee |
| Advisor Name |
Title |
| Taylor, Daniel B. |
Committee Chair |
| Batie, Sandra S. |
Committee Member |
| Bosch, Darrell J. |
Committee Member |
| McKenna, James R. |
Committee Member |
| Norton, George W. |
Committee Member |
|
| Keywords |
- Nitrogen fertilizers Economic aspects Virginia
- Nitrogen fertilizers Virginia
|
| Date of Defense |
1992-09-15 |
| Availability |
restricted |
Abstract
The loss of nitrogen from agricultural land to ground and surface waters is currently a major concern in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Farmers use nutrients on plants to
maximize profit from the selling of a crop. For them losses of nutrients through inappropriate nutrient application are
undesirable. Thus more effective nutrient management is beneficial for both the farmers and the remainder of society.
Achieving environmental quality goals while taking into account farmers' income risk is essential when making fertilization recommendations. This study on Richmond county,
uses the EPIC model and stochastic dominance analysis to compare four different fertilization regimes at the field and farm level; and then uses a sensitivity analysis to examine
how the ranking of different regimes are affected by changes in crop prices. Results suggest that regime 4 which is the EPIC automatic fertilization regime has a better performance
than the other regimes. However potential costs not accounted by EPIC involved at the farm level when using regime 4 may negatively affect its adoption by farmers. Thus further studies need
to be done to understand and assess the performance of regime 4. The results do not show
any significant difference between farm and soil type levels of analysis. The sensitivity analysis mainly affects the less risk averse decision makers, and change only the ranking of the three fertilizer regimes specified by the researcher as
opposed to the automatic fertilizer option of EPIC.
|
| Files |
| Filename |
Size |
Approximate Download Time
(Hours:Minutes:Seconds) |
| 28.8 Modem |
56K Modem |
ISDN (64 Kb) |
ISDN (128 Kb) |
Higher-speed Access |
![[VT]](http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/images/ETD-db/restricted.gif) |
LD5655.V856_1992.M354.pdf |
10.65 Mb |
00:49:19 |
00:25:22 |
00:22:11 |
00:11:05 |
00:00:56 |
![[BTD]](http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/images/ETD-db/btd.gif)
next to an author's name indicates that all
files or directories associated with their ETD
are accessible from the Virginia Tech campus network only.
|