Title page for ETD etd-04282000-15080003


Type of Document Major Paper
Author Genovese, Marie
Author's Email Address mgenoves@vt.edu, mgenov@aol.com
URN etd-04282000-15080003
Title Implications of the Revocation of the "Tulloch Rule"
Degree Master of Urban and Regional Planning
Department Urban Affairs and Planning
Advisory Committee
Advisor Name Title
Richardson, Jesse J. Committee Chair
Randolph, John Committee Member
Zahm, Diane L. Committee Member
Keywords
  • Wetlands
  • Tulloch Rule
Date of Defense 2000-04-20
Availability unrestricted
Abstract
The regulation of wetlands by the federal government has evolved in a peculiar manner. Today, the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulate wetlands through the 404 permitting process in the Clean Water Act. A section 404 permit is required for those activities resulting in the discharge of dredge and fill material. In 1986, in an effort to determine which activities were regulated under the Clean Water Act the Corps and the EPA changed the regulations excluding activities that only resulted in “de minimus incidental soil movement”.

In an attempt to settle a dispute over regulated activities, the federal government adopted the “Tulloch Rule,” effective on August 25, 1993. The Tulloch Rule required a section 404 permit for activities resulting in “incidental fallback”. The Tulloch rule was invalidated on June 19, 1998 by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

The invalidation of the Tulloch Rule caused different results across the United States. Those states with strong state wetlands regulation felt little or no impact. Those states that relied on federal regulation of wetlands saw rapid destruction of wetlands. The latter states reacted in different ways to the revocation of the Tulloch Rule. Stakeholder reactions to the revocation of the Tulloch Rule have also been varied.

Regulation of wetlands should come at the state level to offset this loophole in the Clean Water Act. The revocation of the Tulloch Rule has shown the impacts a reactive approach can have on wetlands protection. States should learn from this experience and begin to implement proactive planning approaches in order to protect their natural resources in the future.

Files
  Filename       Size       Approximate Download Time (Hours:Minutes:Seconds) 
 
 28.8 Modem   56K Modem   ISDN (64 Kb)   ISDN (128 Kb)   Higher-speed Access 
  tulloch.pdf 268.40 Kb 00:01:14 00:00:38 00:00:33 00:00:16 00:00:01

Browse All Available ETDs by ( Author | Department )

dla home
etds imagebase journals news ereserve special collections
virgnia tech home contact dla university libraries

If you have questions or technical problems, please Contact DLA.