| Type of Document |
Dissertation |
| Author |
Jacobs, David Keller
|
| URN |
etd-08252008-161954 |
| Title |
Hydrodynamic and structural constraints on ammonoid shell shape |
| Degree |
PhD |
| Department |
Geological Sciences |
| Advisory Committee |
| Advisor Name |
Title |
| Bambach, Richard K. |
Committee Co-Chair |
| Gilinsky, Norma L. |
Committee Co-Chair |
| Benfield, Ernest Fredrick |
Committee Member |
| Landman, N. L. |
Committee Member |
| Porter, Duncan M. |
Committee Member |
|
| Keywords |
|
| Date of Defense |
1990-08-05 |
| Availability |
restricted |
Abstract
This work examines the structural role of the ammonoid shell in supporting hydrostatic
load and the role of shell shape in facilitating swimming. The history of studies of the role
of the shell in supporting hydrostatic load is discussed first, and is followed by an analysis
of the function of the septal suture. The discussion of swimming consists of a critique of
the previous work which emphasized the use of Nautilus as a modem analogue for
swimming in ammonoids. This is followed by a discussion of flow tank studies that I
conducted to examine the role of shell shape in drag production and power consumption of
swimming in ammonoids.
It had long been thought that the the shells of chambered cephalopods served as
buoyancy compensation devices. However, it was not until the 1960's that the internal
pressure of the shell was demonstrated to be less than one atmosphere, and that the shell
structure supports hydrostatic load. It is remarkable that the internal pressure of
cephalopod shells was not ascertained until the 1960s. As early as 1832 the great anatomist
Richard Owen called for an empirical investigation of this subject. Functional and adaptive
explanations were in vogue in Owen's time as a consequence of William Paley's argument
from design. During the late 19th and early 20th century adaptation and functional
explanations were no longer emphasized in the interpretation of morphology; non-adaptive
evolutionary ideas in vogue in this time period stressed the role of development as a
guiding force. It was not until the mid 20th century that there was renewed interest in
cephalopod functional morphology and the role of the shell in resisting implosion was
ascertained.
|
| Files |
| Filename |
Size |
Approximate Download Time
(Hours:Minutes:Seconds) |
| 28.8 Modem |
56K Modem |
ISDN (64 Kb) |
ISDN (128 Kb) |
Higher-speed Access |
![[VT]](http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/images/ETD-db/restricted.gif) |
LD5655.V856_1990.J347.pdf |
11.52 Mb |
00:53:20 |
00:27:25 |
00:24:00 |
00:12:00 |
00:01:01 |
![[BTD]](http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/images/ETD-db/btd.gif)
next to an author's name indicates that all
files or directories associated with their ETD
are accessible from the Virginia Tech campus network only.
|