| Type of Document |
Dissertation |
| Author |
Lipscomb, Mary Virginia
|
| URN |
etd-09202005-090957 |
| Title |
The response of four ericaceous shrub species to multiple environmental resource variation |
| Degree |
PhD |
| Department |
Biology (Ecology) |
| Advisory Committee |
| Advisor Name |
Title |
| Nilsen, Erik T. |
Committee Chair |
| Kroehler, Carolyn J. |
Committee Member |
| Orcutt, David M. |
Committee Member |
| Porter, Duncan M. |
Committee Member |
| Smith, David William |
Committee Member |
|
| Keywords |
|
| Date of Defense |
1991-01-15 |
| Availability |
restricted |
Abstract
Natural environments are often limiting to plant growth in more than one resource due
to the simultaneous fluctuations in resource supply and demand. The mechanisms a
species uses to acclimate to simultaneous resource variation may not be uniform among
species of the same growth form. Four evergreen ericaceous shrubs responded
individualistically to fluctuations in light and water in an experimental garden study.
Rhododendron maximum and Kalmia latifolia were able to acclimate photosynthetically
to high and low irradiance under both high and low water availability. Rhododendron
catawbiense and R. minus showed significantly higher acclimation to high light in high
water treatments.
All four species were able to reduce their osmotic potential and water deficit at the
turgor loss point seasonally, especially in low water treatments. Low soil water
availability also reduced midday conductance and water potential in all four species.
Rhododendron maximum and R. catawbiense were very conservative in their water use
patterns. Rhododendron minus and K. latifolia exercised less stomatal control over water
loss but did not appear to experience water stress under these treatment conditions.
Rhododendron catawbiense was the most sensitive to low water availability and had the
lowest turgor pressure of the four species.
Daily carbon dioxide assimilation was highest in high light, high water. treatments and
lowest in low light, low water treatments for all four species. During the two years of
this study, these species did not show any consistent pattern of increased growth in the
high light, high water treatments where carbon dioxide assimilation was highest.
Since these species are native to low resource habitats, their abilities to significantly
increase growth during periods of high resource availability may be less than that of
plants adapted to high resource availability.
The results of these experiments indicate that these four species of the same growth
form respond differently to simultaneous fluctuations in light and water resources.
|
| Files |
| Filename |
Size |
Approximate Download Time
(Hours:Minutes:Seconds) |
| 28.8 Modem |
56K Modem |
ISDN (64 Kb) |
ISDN (128 Kb) |
Higher-speed Access |
![[BTD]](http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/images/ETD-db/btd.gif) |
LD5655.V856_1991.L578.pdf |
2.42 Mb |
00:11:11 |
00:05:45 |
00:05:02 |
00:02:31 |
00:00:12 |
![[BTD]](http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/images/ETD-db/btd.gif)
next to an author's name indicates that all
files or directories associated with their ETD
are accessible from the Virginia Tech campus network only.
|