| Type of Document |
Dissertation |
| Author |
Jackson, Giles Alexander
|
| URN |
etd-10192006-115606 |
| Title |
Strategic issues in sustainable development |
| Degree |
PhD |
| Department |
Human Nutrition and Foods |
| Advisory Committee |
| Advisor Name |
Title |
| Olsen, Michael D. |
Committee Chair |
| Boitnott, Richard L. |
Committee Member |
| Bremer, Jennifer |
Committee Member |
| Chon, Kye-Sung |
Committee Member |
| Tse, Eliza C. |
Committee Member |
| Uysal, Muzaffer S. |
Committee Member |
|
| Keywords |
- Sustainable development Developing countries.
|
| Date of Defense |
1994-04-12 |
| Availability |
unrestricted |
Abstract
The paradigm of sustainable development has moved center-stage in the development
community and strategies for achieving sustainable development are proliferating. However, the
capacity of institutions to support sustainable development in non-industrialized countries has not
been adequately addressed. There is a need to solve the sustainable development problem
conceptually by linking strategy content and implementation issues with processes of strategy
formulation internal to institutions. This study investigated the hypothesis that the dominant
"technocratic" approach to strategy formulation, in which development problems are treated as
technical, apolitical problems, creates strategies that probably will not implement sustainable
development as intended.
The World Bank's Strategy for Achieving Sustainable Development in Developing Countries
(1992) was applied to the international tourism industry by twenty-five persons from industry,
academia, non-government organizations and consultancies to identify implementation issues and
problems that might be attributed to use of the technocratic approach. The study found that the
World Bank's strategy probably will not implement sustainable development as intended due to
fundamental conflicts in assumptions about how sustainable development can and should be
achieved.
The findings of this study support the argument made in the literature that a change in approach to strategy formulation is required. The findings also suggest that the proposed
alternative to the technocratic approach may not be sufficient, because it is little more than a
modification of the latter approach and does not resolve the fundamental contradiction between
"induced" and "sustainable" development. A more fundamental shift in the values governing
development may be required to adapt the modus operandi of development institutions to
sustainable development and resolve the value conflicts that continue to diminish the possibility of
consensus and action. Although this study provides knowledge of a limited scope, its findings and
recommendations may guide an improved perception of the complex problem of identifying
requirements for sustainable development and adapting institutions accordingly.
|
| Files |
| Filename |
Size |
Approximate Download Time
(Hours:Minutes:Seconds) |
| 28.8 Modem |
56K Modem |
ISDN (64 Kb) |
ISDN (128 Kb) |
Higher-speed Access |
| |
LD5655.V856_1994.J335.pdf |
12.43 Mb |
00:57:33 |
00:29:35 |
00:25:53 |
00:12:56 |
00:01:06 |
![[BTD]](http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/images/ETD-db/btd.gif)
next to an author's name indicates that all
files or directories associated with their ETD
are accessible from the Virginia Tech campus network only.
|