Title page for ETD etd-11172012-040029
|Type of Document
||Merritt, Deborah Anne
||Body frame measures and perceptions of frame size and weight
||Master of Science
||Human Nutrition and Foods
|Hodges, Patricia A. M.
|Rogers, Cosby Steele
|Taper, L. Janette
|Date of Defense
The purpose of this research was to examine five methods of determining frame size. In addition, self perception of frame size and of desired weight was compared
to two height—weight table recommendations. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to determine relationships between measurements used as criteria for frame measures and between the five frame measures studied. Agreement of frame size identification was
examined by comparing percentages of small, medium and large frame for each method. While the Pearson correlation coefficient of wrist circumference with elbow breadth was
greater than 0.5 for both men and women, the correlations between frame measures using wrist circumference criteria and frame measures using elbow breadth criteria were less
than 0.5. Self-perceived frame size was not significantly
correlated with any of the five frame measures examined or with weight perception variables. Comparison of weight
perception with evaluation of measured weight using two height-weight tables indicated men appear to desire to be heavier and women appear to desire to be thinner than
weights recommended for height and measured frame size. Results were discussed in relation to findings of other researchers. Recommendations were made concerning the frame
measures examined, the relationship of frame size
perception to self-evaluation of weight, and the use of height—weight tables in determining weight goals.
|| Approximate Download Time
| 28.8 Modem
|| 56K Modem
|| ISDN (64 Kb)
|| ISDN (128 Kb)
|| Higher-speed Access
next to an author's name indicates that all
files or directories associated with their ETD
are accessible from the Virginia Tech campus network only.
If you have questions or technical
problems, please Contact DLA.