Scholarly
    Communications Project


Document Type:Master's Thesis
Name:Mark Fisher
Email address:mafishe2@vt.edu
URN:1997/00090
Title:Kant's Critical Attitude Towards The Only Possible Argument
Degree:Master of Arts
Department:Philosophy
Committee Chair: Eric Watkins
Chair's email:watkins@vt.edu
Committee Members:Roger Ariew, Professor
Joseph C. Pitt, Department Head
Keywords:Kant, possibility, necessity, demonstration, God
Date of defense:July 24, 1997
Availability:Release the entire work for Virginia Tech access only.
After one year release worldwide only with written permission of the student and the advisory committee chair.

Abstract:

Kant's Critical Attitude Towards The Only Possible Argument by Mark Fisher Chair: Eric Watkins Philosophy (Abstract) A great deal of attention has been paid to Kant's claim in the Critique of Pure Reason that all theoretical attempts to demonstrate the existence of God must necessarilly end in failure. What has received considerably less attention is the fact that throughout his pre-Critical period, i.e., the period prior to the 1781 publication of the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant develops a unique argument in support of the possibility of such a demonstration. It is obvious that the Critical Kant can no longer maintain the validity of the argument which he presents in The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God (1763); however, it is not obvious exactly how Kant proves that this argument cannot succeed. This thesis is concerned with providing an explanation of the change in Kant's view concerning the possibility of providing a theoretical demonstration of the existence of God.

List of Attached Files

Fisher.pdf bod.pdf. etd.pdf
fm.pdf.

At the author's request, all materials (PDF files, images, etc.) associated with this ETD are accessible from the Virginia Tech network only.


The author grants to Virginia Tech or its agents the right to archive and display their thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in the University Libraries in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. The author retains all proprietary rights, such as patent rights. The author also retains the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation.