Scholarly
    Communications Project


Document Type:Dissertation
Name:Samaresh Priyadarshi
Email address:spriyada@lnc.com
URN:1997/00150
Title:OPTIMAL BOND REFUNDING: EVIDENCE FROM THE MUNICIPAL BOND MARKET
Degree:Doctor of Philosophy
Department:Finance
Committee Chair: Prof. Robert S. Hansen
Chair's email:rob.hansen@vt.edu
Committee Members:
Keywords:Refunding, Optimal Exercise, Municipal Bonds, Embedded Options
Date of defense:May 2, 1997
Availability:Release the entire work for Virginia Tech access only.
After one year release worldwide only with written permission of the student and the advisory committee chair.

Abstract:

This dissertation empirically examines refunding decisions employed by issuers of tax-exempt bonds. Callable bonds contain embedded call options by virtue of provisions in bond indentures that permit the issuing firm to buy back the bond at a predetermined strike price. Such an embedded American call option has two components to its value, the intrinsic value and the time value. The issuer can realize at least as much as the intrinsic value by exercising immediately, when the option is in-the-money. Usually it is optimal for the holder of an in-the money American option to wait rather than exercise immediately, because the option has time value. It is rational for the holder to exercise the option when the total value of the option is no more than the intrinsic value. Option pricing theory can be used to identify two sub-optimal refunding strategies: those that refund too early, and those that refund too late. In such cases the holder incurs losses.

I analyze the refunding decisions for two different samples of tax-exempt bonds issued between 1986 and 1993: the first consists of 2,620 bonds that are called, and the second contains 23,976 bonds that are never called. The generalized Vasicek (1977) model in the Heath, Jarrow, and Morton (1992) framework is used to construct binomial trees for interest rates, bond prices, and call option prices. The option pricing lattice is then used to compute the loss in value from sub-optimal refunding strategies, refunding efficiency, and months from optimal time for bonds in these two samples.

Results suggest that sub-optimal refunding decisions cause losses to the issuers, which are present across bond and issuer characteristics. For the pooled sample of 26,596 bonds, the loss in value from sub-optimal refunding decisions totaled $7.2 billion, amounting to a loss of about 1.75% of total principal amount. Results indicate that issuers either wait too long to refund or never refund and cannot realize the present value saving of switching a high coupon bond with a low coupon bond, over a longer period of time. These results critically depend on the assumptions of underlying term structure model and are sensitive to model calibrated parameter values.

 


List of Attached Files

ETD.PDF

At the author's request, all materials (PDF files, images, etc.) associated with this ETD are accessible from the Virginia Tech network only.


The author grants to Virginia Tech or its agents the right to archive and display their thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in the University Libraries in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. The author retains all proprietary rights, such as patent rights. The author also retains the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation.