Scholarly
    Communications Project


Document Type:Master's Thesis
Name:Peter Kilner
Email address:pkilner@vt.edu
URN:1998/00599
Title:Soldiers, Self-Defense, and Killing in War
Degree:Master of Arts
Department:Philosophy
Committee Chair: Harlan B. Miller
Chair's email:harlan.b.miller@vt.edu
Committee Members:John Christman
Patrick Croskery
Keywords:military ethics, just war, pacifism, killing
Date of defense:May 7, 1998
Availability:Release the entire work immediately worldwide.

Abstract:

Just-Warists and War-Pacifists disagree on whether soldiers are morally justified in killing each other in wartime combat. Many of their respective arguments, and their contradictory conclusions, are based upon principles of self-defense. In this thesis, I examine the role that principles of self-defense play in the arguments surrounding the moral justification of killing in combat. I do so by critiquing both a Just-Warist argument that relies on self-defense (constructed from the works of Michael Walzer and Judith Jarvis Thomson) and a War-Pacifist argument (developed by Richard Norman) that condemns killing in combat based on the moral requirements of self-defense. I demonstrate that both arguments fail due to their mistaken assumptions that soldiers are not morally responsible for their actions. I conclude by arguing that--once soldiers are recognized as morally responsible agents--killing in combat can be morally justified by principles of self-defense.

List of Attached Files

PKVITA.PDF etd.PDF


The author grants to Virginia Tech or its agents the right to archive and display their thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in the University Libraries in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. The author retains all proprietary rights, such as patent rights. The author also retains the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation.