Scholarly
    Communications Project


Document Type:Master's Thesis
Name:Robert T. Prince
Email address:rprince@vt.edu
URN:1998/00506
Title:EVALUATION OF FIELD TESTS PERFORMED ON AN ALUMINUM DECK BRIDGE
Degree:Master of Science
Department:Civil Engineering
Committee Chair: Dr. Thomas Cousins
Chair's email:tcousins@vt.edu
Committee Members:Dr. Richard Barker
Dr. Thomas Murray
Keywords:Aluminum Bridge, Load Distribution, Dynamic Load Allowance
Date of defense:April 6, 1998
Availability:Release the entire work immediately worldwide.

Abstract:

EVALUATION OF FIELD TESTS PERFORMED ON AN ALUMINUM DECK BRIDGE by Robert T. Prince (ABSTRACT) Studies have shown that over 30 percent of the bridges in the United States are structurally deficient, and/or over 50 years old. The majority of the highway bridges have reinforced concrete decks supported on steel or concrete girders. Over the years, weathering and deicing chemicals have caused spalling of the concrete surrounding the reinforcing steel, deteriorating many bridges to levels that often result in closure. Repairing or reconstructing the reinforced concrete deck to meet current design specifications is often not possible or feasible, and at times seems illogical due to the possibility of reoccurrence. Because of reinforced concrete's downfalls, there is a move toward alternative materials and designs for bridge deck replacements. In particular, Reynolds Metals Company has lead the movement toward the use of a shop-extruded aluminum deck system known as ALUMADECKTM. The purpose of this research is to evaluate data collected from full-scale testing under test truck loading of an in-service ALUMADECK bridge system. The bridge is known as the Little Buffalo Creek Bridge and is located in Mecklenburg County, VA. The topics researched from the load tests are the composite action amongst the deck and supporting members, the load distribution amongst supporting members, the dynamic load allowance for supporting members, and the developed deck stresses due to test truck loads. Evaluations of the research topics include comparisons to the methods employed in the design calculations provided by VDOT and to those of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) design specifications.

List of Attached Files

abs.pdf ack.pdf appa.pdf
appb.pdf ch1.pdf ch2.pdf
ch3.pdf ch4.pdf ch5.pdf
ch6.pdf ch7.pdf ch8.pdf
ch9.pdf figs.pdf ref.pdf
tabs.pdf toc.pdf tp.pdf
vita.pdf


The author grants to Virginia Tech or its agents the right to archive and display their thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in the University Libraries in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. The author retains all proprietary rights, such as patent rights. The author also retains the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation.