Steven Joseph Marques Junior
Master's Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Tech in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
Master of Science
in
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Approved
U. Vandsburger
December 2, 1996
Blacksburg, Virginia
The objectives of this study were to implement a system to measure mixing in non-reacting flows and to study the mass transfer characteristics of two actively excited turbulent jets. This thesis describes the acquisition and analysis of phase-locked concentration field data using planar Mie scattering from smoke particles and planar laser-induced fluorescence of acetone. Both techniques were shown to be effective in providing information for the actively excited nozzles. However, the laser-induced fluorescence technique was superior for revealing detail in the flowfield structure. Spatial mode control techniques were applied to a triangular nozzle with vibrating actuators as the three sides and a swirl nozzle with pulsating tangential air jets. The effect of the different spatial modes on jet column development and the far fields of both nozzles is presented. Two- and three-dimensional iso-intensity contours, showing the relative intensity of light scattered by the nozzle fluid marker, were generated to show the flow structure. The areas inside the iso-intensity contours in the far field were also measured to determine relative effectiveness of nozzle fluid transport. Large scale structures were visible in the three-dimensional iso-intensity contours from both nozzles. In addition, the transport of seeded nozzle fluid was enhanced by the spatial mode excitation for both nozzles. Spatial mode excitation was also able to affect the shape of the far field contour. In particular, the first counterrotating helical mode, m=±1, generated the greatest effect on nozzle fluid transport and the most pronounced elliptical contour shape in the far field.
| File Name | Size (Bytes) |
| APPEND.PDF | 41,014 Bytes |
| BIBLIO.PDF | 14,468 Bytes |
| CH1.PDF | 21,925 Bytes |
| CH2.PDF | 32,345 Bytes |
| CH3.PDF | 34,623 Bytes |
| CH4.PDF | 35,398 Bytes |
| CH5.PDF | 11,500 Bytes |
| ETD.PDF | 43,142 Bytes |
| FIG2_1.PDF | 6,827 Bytes |
| FIG2_2.PDF | 5,527 Bytes |
| FIG2_3.PDF | 6,773 Bytes |
| FIG2_4.PDF | 4,689 Bytes |
| FIG3_1.PDF | 4,718 Bytes |
| FIG3_2.PDF | 5,581 Bytes |
| FIG3_3.PDF | 142,016 Bytes |
| FIG3_4.PDF | 194,285 Bytes |
| FIG3_5.PDF | 105,789 Bytes |
| FIG3_6.PDF | 139,041 Bytes |
| FIG3_7.PDF | 6,488 Bytes |
| FIG3_8.PDF | 205,592 Bytes |
| FIG3_9.PDF | 205,666 Bytes |
| FIG4_1.PDF | 7,672 Bytes |
| FIG4_10.PDF | 6,291 Bytes |
| FIG4_11.PDF | 372,682 Bytes |
| FIG4_12.PDF | 6,273 Bytes |
| FIG4_2.PDF | 5,161 Bytes |
| FIG4_3.PDF | 360,138 Bytes |
| FIG4_4.PDF | 363,341 Bytes |
| FIG4_5.PDF | 359,997 Bytes |
| FIG4_6.PDF | 114,435 Bytes |
| FIG4_7.PDF | 115,550 Bytes |
| FIG4_8.PDF | 113,765 Bytes |
| FIG4_9.PDF | 364,299 Bytes |
| VITA.PDF | 5,250 Bytes |