ROANOKE TIMES

                         Roanoke Times
                 Copyright (c) 1995, Landmark Communications, Inc.

DATE: TUESDAY, May 22, 1990                   TAG: 9005220447
SECTION: EDITORIAL                    PAGE: A6   EDITION: METRO 
SOURCE: 
DATELINE:                                 LENGTH: Medium


SIGNING: ONE A LANGUAGE, THE OTHER A CODE

An april 16 article, "Deaf pupils testing IBM program," stated that American Sign Language (ASL) "is less formal and more conversational" than Manually Coded English (MCE). We would like to clarify some of the differences between American Sign Language and Manually Coded English.

ASL is a visual-gestural language, which is indigenous to the American deaf community and is an integral component of deaf culture. As a recognized language, ASL has its own linguistic components that are influenced by ASL's visual-gestural aspects, thereby making difficult its comparison to spoken English.

On the other hand (no pun intended), MCE is a manual code that represents English in a visual manner. It is not a language; it is a code that borrows both from spoken English grammar and ASL sign vocabulary, and combines to make English visible on the hands.

ASL is more concept-based. It uses a "topic-comment" structure (often found in Spanish, French, etc.), while MCE tends to use English word order and is often signed word-for-word.

Regarding the point that ASL is "less formal and more conversational," it should be emphasized that ASL, like other languages, has varying levels of formality. It is a valid language with a range of formality to fit appropriate situations.

To make it seem less than so, as is implied in your article, denigrates the status of ASL as a language.

\ DAWN SHEPHERD\ TODD KING\ CONNIE WILKINSON\ RITA LYONS\ DUBLIN

Editor's note: This letter was signed also by five other members of the ASL linguistics class of the interpreter-training program at New River Community College.



 by CNB