ROANOKE TIMES

                         Roanoke Times
                 Copyright (c) 1995, Landmark Communications, Inc.

DATE: THURSDAY, July 5, 1990                   TAG: 9007050237
SECTION: VIRGINIA                    PAGE: B-3   EDITION: EVENING  
SOURCE: BY BETSY BIESENBACH
DATELINE:                                 LENGTH: Medium


VINTON ANNEXATION OPPOSED

If petitions that have been circulating among east Roanoke County residents are accurate, almost 90 percent do not want their property annexed by the town of Vinton, whether the proposed Roanoke-Roanoke County consolidation agreement is approved or not.

Six of those residents appeared at a regular meeting of Town Council Tuesday to complain about the proposal.

Michael Schneider, an east county resident, complained to Mayor Charles Hill about comments Hill had made in a story that appeared in this newspaper on June 28. In response to a suggestion made by Roanoke County Supervisor Howard Musser, Hill rejected a move to allow east county residents to vote on whether they want to be annexed into the town.

Any changes to portions of the consolidation agreement that pertain to the town "would severely impact the future" of Vinton, Hill said. Because the agreement already had been signed by Roanoke and Roanoke County, any changes would require the renegotiation of much of the agreement, he said.

"I don't presume to speak for every resident in the area," Schneider said, but being denied a vote would be "grossly unfair" and tantamount to taxation without representation. "We are being treated in a discriminatory manner."

Annexation, he added, would bring higher taxes and perhaps reduced services. Schneider urged council to agree to a vote to "see how we stand on the matter. That's the way government should be run."

"I'm behind him 100 percent," said east county resident Rebecca Karnes. "If you talk to people, they do not want to be in the town. I feel the people should be heard."

Hill told the residents that, as he had stated June 28, the town is not a party to the consolidation agreement, had "no input whatever," into drafting the document and cannot make the decision whether to allow the vote.

"Any changes must be the responsibility of Roanoke and Roanoke County," he said.

Town officials were reluctant to endorse any changes to the agreement as it pertains to the town, because one change would affect everything else.

"We didn't want to change it, not knowing what the outcome would be," said council member Roy McCarty, who has come out strongly against consolidation. "It was defeated [in 1969] and it will be defeated now," he said. "I think we have to fight consolidation. I think this council should be fighting consolidation."

"We're not selling you a bill of goods," Nester said. "Everybody's trying to find a villain" in this, but "don't look at these gentlemen," he said, motioning toward council.

"You need to get after the Board of Supervisors," McCarty said.

"They're next!" several residents cried in unison.

***CORRECTION***

Published correction ran on July 6, 1990 in the evening edition\ Correction

Because of a reporter's error, Roanoke City Councilman Howard Musser was incorrectly identified in a story in Thursday's edition about a Vinton Town Council meeting.


Memo: correction

by CNB