Roanoke Times Copyright (c) 1995, Landmark Communications, Inc. DATE: THURSDAY, March 7, 1991 TAG: 9103070102 SECTION: BUSINESS PAGE: A-11 EDITION: METRO SOURCE: Associated Press DATELINE: WASHINGTON LENGTH: Short
Labor Secretary Lynn Martin told a House panel that the measure would give too much power to unions, promote labor unrest and hurt the economy. Her statement was the first defining the administration position..
The AFL-CIO and many congressional Democrats consider the measure critical to ensuring that American workers maintain their decades-old legal right to strike.
The 14.2-million-member AFL-CIO, which has long complained that the White House overlooks workers' needs, vowed to make the legislation a top priority in Congress this year.
"If the bill were presented to the president, his senior advisers would recommend a veto," Martin told the House Education and Labor subcommittee on labor-management relations.
AFL-CIO President Lane Kirkland said the measure was necessary to protect America's unionized workers. And Rep. William Ford, D-Mich., chairman of the Education and Labor Committee, said it was needed to keep employers from "annihilating" unions.
by CNB