Roanoke Times Copyright (c) 1995, Landmark Communications, Inc. DATE: SUNDAY, April 7, 1991 TAG: 9104090482 SECTION: EDITORIAL PAGE: D-2 EDITION: METRO SOURCE: DATELINE: LENGTH: Short
Thomas approvingly quotes legal opinions that would permit such prayers on the grounds that they are essentially trivial: "To invoke Divine guidance . . . is simply a tolerable acknowledgement of beliefs widely held . . . " "(T)he practice . . . is merely an acknowledgement of religious heritage and tradition . . . The prayers are merely . . . incidental . . . "
Those for whom prayer is never "merely" anything other than address to a holy and sovereign God are offended by attempts to use such address "to solemnize public occasions," "creating an air of dignity." Decisions to exclude prayer from such occasions can be based in part on a desire to protect this sacred privilege from such trivialization and self-serving abuse.
Finally, Thomas fails to address the inevitable and thorny questions: In a religiously pluralistic society, to which putative god, goddess or godlet should commencement prayers be addressed? And which claimant(s) to divinity should be invoked for presence and blessing? MARK WM. RADECKE Pastor, Christ Evangelical Lutheran Church ROANOKE
by CNB