by Bhavesh Jinadra by CNB
Roanoke Times Copyright (c) 1995, Landmark Communications, Inc. DATE: FRIDAY, January 8, 1993 TAG: 9301080243 SECTION: VIRGINIA PAGE: B-1 EDITION: METRO SOURCE: JAY TAYLOR CORRESPONDENT DATELINE: LEXINGTON LENGTH: Medium
PLANNERS OK ROCKBRIDGE QUARRY PLEA FOR 10 ACRES
Having already turned down Charles W. Barger & Son's request to open up 112 acres of untouched county farmland for industrial use, the Rockbridge County Planning Commission on Thursday night gave its OK to a rezoning of 10 acres to quarry limestone.Tha planners also unanimously endorsed Barger's request for a special-use permit, which is necessary for mining the land. But they decided to meet later to discuss conditions.
"I am very disappointed," company President Chuck Barger said after the meeting. "I'm sure there are many other conditions in mind [by the planners] that we don't fully understand."
Barger's requests next go to the county Board of Supervisors, with whom the final decision rests.
The Planning Commission wasn't sure of the exact boundaries of the 10 acres within the original 112-acre parcel, and in its motion it referred to the land as "10 acres approximately shown on the map." The map, which was not previously available to the public or the planners, was produced by Barger. He included no site plan or topographic map.
As the meeting broke up, the planners asked Barger to provide more detailed information about the 10 acres.
Chairman Bill Bean did not allow county and city residents to speak Thursday on the 10-acre proposal because, he said, the public comment phase of the hearing had ended after Wednesday night's five-hour meeting.
Planning Commission member Ben Nicely objected to the 10-acre proposal. "I think we are setting a dangerous precedent tonight. We looked at 112 acres. We rejected that. . . . Is this opportunity going to be granted for every case that comes before the Planning Commission?
"I'm sure that today, a lot of political maneuvering was done, probably more than in an election year. The public will be sent the wrong message by everything that has transpired."
Vicki Kruse said she feared Barger's operations eventually would march across more land. "All Mr. Barger wants is a little more land and a little more land. It is a very good thing to ask for the moon and settle for a star."
After the 6-3 vote in favor of the rezoning, the planners turned their attention to the special-use permit.
In a public hearing on the permit, Barger and his lawyer, William McClung, reiterated their arguments for the rezoning: that if Barger is denied the right to mine the new land, not only will his mining operation close, but also his construction and cement operations will fail.
Barger's new quarry would be an extension of his existing quarry, which lies near U.S. 60 outside Lexington. He had hoped to mine about 48 acres of the 112 acres proposed for rezoning.