ROANOKE TIMES

                         Roanoke Times
                 Copyright (c) 1995, Landmark Communications, Inc.

DATE: WEDNESDAY, February 17, 1993                   TAG: 9302170026
SECTION: NATIONAL/INTERNATIONAL                    PAGE: A1   EDITION: METRO  
SOURCE: Los Angeles Times
DATELINE:                                 LENGTH: Long


HYUNDAI SWERVES ON SWIMSUIT ISSUE

When the annual swimsuit issue of Sports Illustrated hits the newsstands today, something besides body covering will be missing.

Hyundai, a longtime advertiser, has decided to skip the issue that features revealing photographs of women in skimpy swimsuits.

"If this particular issue [of Sports Illustrated] is of concern to some of our customers, we'd prefer to steer away from it," said Joe Corey, national advertising manager at Fountain Valley, Calif.-based Hyundai Motor America Corp., which particularly objects to pictures of children in swimsuits, which were in last year's issue.

Hyundai's public action may mark a turning point for women's and consumer groups that have for years voiced loud protests to the annual issue. It long has been Sports Illustrated's best-selling issue - and by far its most popular with advertisers. The magazine has also built a multimillion-dollar industry around the issue, selling everything from calendars to video cassettes that feature models from the swimsuit edition.

The South Korean car maker was swayed by the lobbying efforts of Linnea W. Smith, a psychiatrist in Chapel Hill, N.C., whose husband, Dean, is head basketball coach at the University of North Carolina.

Smith sent letters to 60 advertisers advising them that the issue is degrading to both women and children. Only Hyundai listened. But the impact of that one decision eventually could be profound.

Sports Illustrated says its swimsuit issue is read by one out of every four Americans - making it one of the best-read single issues of any magazine in the world. Advertisers pay a premium to appear in it - $156,410 for a single, full-color page. And consumers pay a premium, too. This year's newsstand edition sells for $4.95 - a dollar more than last year, and $2 more than conventional issues of Sports Illustrated.

But a backlash to the swimsuit issue could be brewing. Some advertisers say that while they plan to stick with the swimsuit issue because of its huge readership, they increasingly are hearing from consumers who don't like it. And ad agency media buyers say that by next year, additional advertisers might be emboldened to take a harder look at whether they want to be associated with major sports publications - including Inside Sports and Sport magazine - that annually publish issues mostly devoted to models in sexy swimsuits.

For years, powerful special interest groups have successfully coaxed major advertisers to pull their ads from certain networks, magazines or newspapers. In 1991, complaints from the conservative American Family Association persuaded Mazda to yank its ads from NBC's "Saturday Night Live." And that same year, Mars Inc. pulled ads for Twix cookies after a coalition of girls' schools complained that the spot put girls' schools in a bad light.

But the action by Hyundai wasn't a result of threats from some well-funded group with thousands of members. Hyundai concedes it was a result of the efforts of one woman.

"I'll tell you this," said Smith, who also plans to send angry letters to all advertisers in the upcoming swimsuit issue, "my next car will be a Hyundai."

Besides catching the eye of some advertisers, Smith's campaign also caught the attention of her husband, the coach. "He certainly doesn't feel that Sports Illustrated's swimsuit issue does a service for the sports community," she said. "He recognizes it for what it is."

Smith began her letter-writing campaign in November before most advertisers had completed their 1993 media buys. The letter pointedly told advertisers, "When you advertise in Sports Illustrated's swimsuit issue, you're saying to the world that it's OK to devalue women."

Most of the advertisers didn't even bother to reply, Smith said. The few that did offered little encouragement. But when Hyundai told her that it agreed with her - and would not advertise in the issue - Smith never expected that the firm would go public with its reasoning. But it has.

Sports Illustrated executives are trying to play down Hyundai's action. "It's the first I've heard of an advertiser pulling out of the swimsuit issue for reasons of taste," said John Jay, associate publisher. Jay noted that Hyundai will continue to advertise in other issues of the magazine.

"I think there is the potential for some alienation," said Scott Bedbury, Nike's director of advertising. "But we're not just advertising in there because it's the swimsuit issue. We've bought 50 pages in their last 52 issues. With new product introductions, we need Sports Illustrated heavily in the spring."

But one critic insists that Nikeand other big advertisers - like Anheuser-Busch and Joseph E. Seagram & Sons - have other reasons for appearing in the swimsuit issue. "The decision gets made in a male-bonding, Madison Avenue sort of way," said Cecilia Blewer, a steering committee director of the New York-based group Women Against Pornography. "Advertisers should know that a lot of women intercept this issue when it comes into their homes and, in their one feminist statement for the year, they toss it out."

Sports Illustrated executives say that's nonsense. But swimsuit issue advertisers say that they are increasingly hearing from individual women and women's groups that strongly oppose the issue.

Earlier this year, protests from women led to the Atlanta Hawks basketball team's canceling its annual halftime swimsuit fashion show, which for years featured women in skimpy swimsuits parading across the basketball court. "It was becoming too big an issue," said Lee Douglas, executive vice president of the Hawks. "We decided it was best to get out of it."

That is exactly what Media Watch, a Santa Cruz, Calif.-based consumer organization, wants Sports Illustrated to do. The group's director, Ann Simonton, is a former cover-girl model for Sports Illustrated's swimsuit issue who has since become an outspoken opponent of the edition. Her group helped Smith distribute her protest letters to the advertisers.

"Advertisers who are part of the swimsuit issue look pretty foolish," Simonton said. "They are promoting violence against women."



by Archana Subramaniam by CNB