Roanoke Times Copyright (c) 1995, Landmark Communications, Inc. DATE: TUESDAY, February 22, 1994 TAG: 9402220052 SECTION: NATIONAL/INTERNATIONAL PAGE: A-6 EDITION: METRO SOURCE: Associated Press DATELINE: WASHINGTON LENGTH: Short
While the industry is no longer in financial trouble, echoes of the S&L disaster remain, like the 1989 failure of an obscure Arkansas thrift, Madison Guaranty Savings and Loan.
Madison's owner - 11 years before the failure - invested in some rural real estate with a small-state governor who later became president.
On Thursday, Republicans hope to turn a congressional hearing on the performance of the Resolution Trust Corp. into a forum on President Clinton's long-ago investment.
The thrift industry now looks like this: last year, only 10 S&Ls failed, the fewest since 1979. None have failed so far this year.
The industry - about half its former size - is profitable. It earned $8.9 billion since the start of 1992. And the government bureaucracy charged with cleaning up the mess is making plans to close - its work finished - by the end of next year.
So what did the taxpayers get for all their money?
According to economists, the payoff is not in what taxpayers gained but in what they avoided: a collapse of the financial system and the irrevocable rupturing of public trust in the government.
"The taxpayers stepped up because the government had already guaranteed the depositors would not take a loss," said University of Houston Professor Paul Horvitz. "The government and the taxpayer had to make good on that obligation. There was really no alternative."
by CNB