Roanoke Times Copyright (c) 1995, Landmark Communications, Inc. DATE: SUNDAY, June 19, 1994 TAG: 9406190036 SECTION: NATIONAL/INTERNATIONAL PAGE: A4 EDITION: METRO SOURCE: Newsday DATELINE: NEW YORK LENGTH: Medium
"If someone offered, I'd jump at it," the Huntington Bay, N.Y., resident told Newsday in his first interview since his virtual exoneration in a criminal trial four years ago.
No matter how the legal maelstrom that has surrounded Hazelwood plays out, to many it would seem highly unlikely that a shipping company would place a captain found to have been drunk back on the bridge.
His odds appear even slimmer after a civil jury in Alaska a week ago branded him a reckless and negligent skipper and made the company that fired him, Exxon Corp., liable for billions in compensatory and punitive damages. Lawyers for 14,000 fishermen and Alaska natives convinced the jury that the Exxon Valdez went aground in Prince William Sound because Hazelwood was drunk and left the bridge at a critical point, and that Exxon was at fault because it had done nothing about Hazelwood's drinking problem.
Michael Chalos of Centre Island, N.Y., Hazelwood's lawyer, said the verdict will be appealed.
After the 11 million-gallon spill coated 1,500 miles of coast, killed thousands of animals, interrupted the breeding of countless species and crippled the fishing industry, Hazelwood was cleared of all criminal charges except for a misdemeanor charge of negligent discharge of oil. That conviction is being appealed. The Coast Guard exonerated him on intoxication charges and suspended his master's license for less than a year. So the 47-year-old mariner said he was surprised and disappointed at the civil trial jury's findings.
"I thought we put on a pretty good case," Hazelwood said before heading back to Anchorage for the damages-setting phase of the trial. "The facts hadn't changed. I wasn't particularly disheartened, because in the last five years I've come to realize that in litigation like this it's a long road, and there's going to be some speed bumps in it every once in a while. It's just another chapter in the saga."
While the saga has played out, Hazelwood has worked doing investigative and paralegal work for Chalos' Manhattan maritime law firm. Before that he delivered yachts, did marine surveying and worked on a lobster boat he owned with a friend.
Before departing on the trip that ended at Bligh Reef, the plaintiffs' lawyer said, Hazelwood drank heavily all day and left the bridge before the grounding because he was drunk.
The captain said he had had three vodkas. "There were 20 witnesses who came in and said he was not impaired," Chalos said. "Alcohol played no part in the grounding."
by CNB