Roanoke Times
Copyright (c) 1995, Landmark Communications, Inc.
DATE: THURSDAY, October 27, 1994 TAG: 9411120026
SECTION: NEIGHBORS PAGE: N8 EDITION: METRO
SOURCE: RON BROWN STAFF WRITER
DATELINE: LENGTH: Medium
"We're kind of staying neutral on the issue," said Lloyd Bisnett, the manager of Marianetti's Restaurant. "We've discussed it, and that's about it."
Proponents of legalized mixed-drink sales claim it is the magic elixir for a sagging tourism trade around exit 150 of Interstate 81 at Troutville.
Opponents say it could increase the number of drunken drivers and accidents around the already congested interchange.
Voters have been relatively quiet in their positions. A campaign, which started with petitions being circulated door to door, seems to have been waged more by private discussion than public controversy.
In other jurisdictions, the fire for the campaign to get liquor by the drink passed usually has come from restaurants that foresee enhanced revenue from liquor sales.
Proponents argue that liquor by the drink is needed to boost investment interests from high-quality motels and restaurants.
Michael Trivette, manager of the Outdoor Inn, said that while liquor sales may be good for tourism, it could have an adverse effect on local residents.
"What concerns me is how it affects working people every day," he said. "Is Johnny Law going to be waiting around every corner?"
While he admits that liquor is more lucrative, he says there would be some drawbacks for his business.
He would have to revamp his menu to make sure he was serving enough food to meet sales quotas imposed on liquor licensees. His pool table would have to go, he said.
The food requirement for beer licenses is more easily attainable.
With so many thorny legal issues to consider, Trivette said he isn't about to get too worked up about something that might not even gain voter approval.
"I'm just going to hold my cards and see if it passes," he said.
by CNB