ROANOKE TIMES

                         Roanoke Times
                 Copyright (c) 1995, Landmark Communications, Inc.

DATE: WEDNESDAY, November 30, 1994                   TAG: 9411300060
SECTION: BUSINESS                    PAGE: B-6   EDITION: METRO 
SOURCE: The Washington Post
DATELINE: WASHINGTON                                 LENGTH: Medium


SANTA FE OPENS DOOR TO MERGER

Santa Fe Pacific Corp. on Tuesday opened its door slightly to a possible acquisition by Union Pacific Corp. but also adopted a policy apparently intended to slam the door shut if the Santa Fe board doesn't like what it sees.

Santa Fe already has a merger agreement with Burlington Northern Corp. to form a giant system to compete with Union Pacific and has been fending off Union Pacific's counteroffers. But Tuesday, Santa Fe announced it would meet with Union Pacific ``in an effort to clarify and improve Union Pacific's offer.''

A Santa Fe shareholder meeting planned for Friday to vote on the Santa Fe-Burlington Northern merger was postponed until Dec. 16.

``We've been knocking on the door, and someone answered,'' said Union Pacific spokesman Gary Schuster.

The announcement came the day after the Interstate Commerce Commission approved Union Pacific's plan to use a voting trust to purchase Santa Fe stock. This would give Santa Fe shareholders their money up front, protecting them in case the ICC rejected a Union Pacific-Santa Fe combination.

The two railroads have some largely parallel lines, and proposed mergers of parallel lines often have been regarded as anticompetitive by the ICC. A Santa Fe-Burlington Northern combination, on the other hand, would have little overlap.

Union Pacific is basing its offer on a higher value offer - now valued at $16.93 a share in cash and stock vs. Burlington Northern's $15.98 a share in stock - plus assurances that it will make enough concessions to other railroads to gain ICC approval.

At the same time it agreed to talk to Union Pacific, Santa Fe also adopted a complicated ``shareholder rights plan'' that appears to be a form of antimerger ``poison pill'' provision, although Schuster said Union Pacific initially is confused as to exactly what it means.



 by CNB