Roanoke Times Copyright (c) 1995, Landmark Communications, Inc. DATE: TUESDAY, February 7, 1995 TAG: 9502070099 SECTION: VIRGINIA PAGE: C-5 EDITION: METRO SOURCE: Associated Press DATELINE: CHARLOTTESVILLE LENGTH: Short
In a five-page statement released Sunday, the board said the Honor Committee ``is accountable for its actions to the board, just as the board is accountable to the General Assembly.''
The statement also said the honor system is ``laden with ambiguities'' and needs to be restructured.
Critics said the UVa administration pressured the Honor Committee to grant the rare retrial of undergraduate Christopher Leggett after he threatened to file a lawsuit. Board members and administration officials countered that Leggett's rights of due process had been compromised.
In Sunday's statement, board members said state law required them to oversee the ``government and discipline'' of the students.
``The fact that we have ultimate responsibility is clear ... If something was to go wrong and a lawsuit was filed, they would look to us, not the Honor Committee,'' said Robert G. Butcher Jr., a member of the board's Executive Committee.
Board members said they hoped to revamp the system by the end of the academic year. They said the new process likely would result in the formation of a grievance panel as a ``last resort for students'' not satisfied with how their honor case is handled.
by CNB