Roanoke Times Copyright (c) 1995, Landmark Communications, Inc. DATE: WEDNESDAY, February 15, 1995 TAG: 9502150079 SECTION: NATL/INTL PAGE: NATL/ITNL EDITION: METRO SOURCE: Seattle Post-Intelligencer DATELINE: WASHINGTON LENGTH: Short
U.S. District Judge Stanley Sporkin ruled that the proposed settlement failed to correct damage done to the economy by the software giant's monopolistic practices.
In a 45-page opinion issued late Tuesday, Sporkin said ``the court cannot find the proposed decree to be in the public interest. ... The scope of the decree is too narrow.'
``Simply telling a defendant to go forth and sin no more does little or nothing to address the unfair advantage it has already gained,'' he declared. ``The decree is too little, too late.''
The ruling left the Justice Department with the choice of appealing to a higher court; taking Microsoft to trial on its antitrust allegations, which would be a long and costly process, or trying to renegotiate with Microsoft a settlement that Sporkin would accept, which would take deft footwork.
The judge set a hearing for March 16 to consider the case again.
A Microsoft spokeswoman said the company was ``obviously disappointed'' by the ruling. The company has steadfastly maintained that it has broken no antitrust laws and that the company enjoys no authentic monopoly power in the fast-changing computer industry.
It is extraordinary for a court to reject an antitrust settlement, although federal courts do have a role in reviewing and approving such pacts.
by CNB