Roanoke Times Copyright (c) 1995, Landmark Communications, Inc. DATE: WEDNESDAY, June 14, 1995 TAG: 9506140094 SECTION: NATIONAL/INTERNATIONAL PAGE: A-1 EDITION: METRO SOURCE: Associated Press DATELINE: WASHINGTON LENGTH: Medium
But his gesture drew fire from Republicans and Democrats alike. Indeed the vehemence of the Democratic criticism was remarkable.
Clinton said in a brief Oval Office address to the nation his proposal would cut federal spending by $1.1 trillion over the 10-year span. He said it would protect certain programs, such as education and some environmental programs. ``But make no mistake, in other areas these will be big cuts. And they will hurt.''
The new proposal calls for $127 billion in Medicare cuts, about half the amount sought by Republicans, and for trimming $25 billion from subsidies and tax breaks enjoyed by corporations.
It also resurrects a modest health-reform plan and retains a middle-income tax cut previously proposed by Clinton.
The plan was greeted with deep skepticism from Republicans, who are on their way toward enacting a balanced budget.
Leaders of Clinton's own party also tried to dissuade him, fearing they would lose important political ammunition for denouncing GOP-sponsored cuts.
In a bitter commentary, Rep. David Obey of Wisconsin, the ranking House Democrat on appropriations, said, ``I think most of us learned some time ago that if you don't like the president's position on a particular issue, you simply need to wait a few weeks.''
In all, Clinton's plan would achieve $517 billion in net deficit reduction over seven years, and $1.23 trillion over 10 - including the cost of the tax cut.
That plan calls for a $500-per-child tax break and allows families earning under $100,000 to deduct up to $10,000 a year in college tuition.
Other aspects of the proposal:
Trims welfare costs by $35 billion, less than half the size of the Republican plans; saves $55 billion in Medicaid costs, about one-third that in GOP plans.
Makes widespread general cuts across a wide range of agencies of more than 20 percent by the end of the 10-year period.
Proposes no change in the president's proposed levels of defense spending.
by CNB