The Virginian-Pilot
                             THE VIRGINIAN-PILOT 
              Copyright (c) 1995, Landmark Communications, Inc.

DATE: Thursday, November 2, 1995             TAG: 9511020006
SECTION: FRONT                    PAGE: A14  EDITION: FINAL 
TYPE: Letter 
                                             LENGTH: Short :   35 lines

``GROSS'' INCOME IS NOT ``NET'' INCOME

Your newspaper erroneously reports in its front-page article on the 13th Senatorial District race, that I ``make at least $150,000 a year from my law practice, title-insurance company and a real-estate venture.''

Your reporters reputedly obtained their information from a Statement of Economic Interest that I file each year with the Senate clerk's office. Under Schedule ``F'' of that statement, I am required to report ``gross'' income from any self- or family-owned business (including rental property). There are two choices - ``gross'' income of ``$50,000 or less'' or ``gross'' income of ``more than $50,000.''

While my ``gross'' fees from my law practice were more than $50,000, my net income was considerably less. And while the title agency had ``gross'' premium income of more than $50,000, the company actually ended with a ``net'' loss.

The ``real-estate venture'' referred to is the 5,000-square-foot office building that started my financial troubles. While rents amount to about $50,000 a year, mortgage payments, real-estate taxes and the expenses of operating the building leave a net loss, even before depreciation.

Any high-school accounting students knows the difference between ``gross'' income and ``net'' income. So should your staff writers.

FREDERICK M. QUAYLE

Senator, 13th Senatorial District

Chesapeake, Oct. 31, 1995 by CNB