The Virginian-Pilot
                             THE VIRGINIAN-PILOT 
              Copyright (c) 1996, Landmark Communications, Inc.

DATE: Wednesday, September 25, 1996         TAG: 9609250389
SECTION: LOCAL                   PAGE: B3   EDITION: FINAL 
SERIES: At Issue: Leadership
SOURCE: BY MEREDITH COHN, STAFF WRITER 
DATELINE: CHESAPEAKE                        LENGTH:  130 lines

LEADERS, THIS VOTER SAYS, MUST LISTEN AND RESPOND

Peggy Whitehurst believes, for the most part, that elected officials do their best to meet constituents' needs. But ``they can't do everything for everybody,'' she says. More citizens need to exercise their own leadership qualities and look for ``fewer freebies'' from society, says the retired volunteer director at Sentara Norfolk General Hospital.

Peggy Whitehurst's constituency is composed of preschoolers at her church and her grandson's classmates at Western Branch Elementary School. They also are the sick members of her community and her neighbors in Silverwood.

She listens to their needs and tries to respond.

Whitehurst is not a politician. She's a volunteer and a leader in her community, and she says the tasks she undertakes are supplemental to her elected officials' duties.

``It's what I've always done,'' she said. ``Without volunteers, how many things would go lacking? If people didn't do things like give blood, wouldn't we really be in trouble?''

Whitehurst retired three years ago, after more than two decades of service as the volunteer director at Sentara Norfolk General Hospital.

She now helps out in the classroom at her grandson's school in Western Branch. She serves on the board of the Portsmouth-West Chesapeake Red Cross. At church, she has Sunday School and preschool classes. Recently, she joined a citizens' advisory council that is guiding the U.S. Postal Service to provide better service in her neighborhood.

To effectively lead, Whitehurst says, first you must accept your limits. You must listen to your constituency to establish their needs and desires. Then you go about meeting them. Balancing those things with your time and your own beliefs on how issues should be handled is a judgment.

``Basically, I believe those in government really try, as I do,'' she said. ``It's a mammoth operation. . . . They can't do everything for everybody. And I think that must be the frustration of elected officials, because I believe most of them want to.''

She said average citizens expect too much from their government, and more people need to exercise their leadership qualities and look for ``fewer freebies'' from society. Residents need to vote and call and write to their leaders.

``They make a good effort to make sure we have their numbers and addresses,'' she said. ``We just need to use them more. They can't call us all.'' ILLUSTRATION: Color photo on page B1 by MARK MITCHELL, The

Virginian-Pilot

Peggy Whitehurst...

Photo

Peggy Whitehurst, holding her grandson Matthew Baldwin, works hard

as a volunteer and wants the same kind of dedication in her

leaders. But, she says, citizens must help.

Graphic with photos of candidates

Whitehurst's Question: If the mission of a leader is to set goals

and accomplish them for a constituency, why do so many candidates

feel it is necessary to spend time knocking their opponents?

SENATE

John Warner's response: ``In every political campaign I have run,

I have dedicated myself to sharing with Virginians my vision on the

issues. While others may engage in name-calling and berating their

opponents, that has never been my style, nor will it be.''

Mark R. Warner's response: ``Some candidates resort to personal

negative attacks because they don't have any new ideas to offer the

electorate. I don't believe personal attacks should have a place in

today's political arena, so I have pledged not to engage in that

type of campaigning. Campaigns are about ideas, issues and voting

records. Providing voters with accurate information about the policy

differences between the candidates is an important part of any

campaign, and something I will continue to do. During the remainder

of the campaign I will continue to communicate with Virginians about

why I want to get hired for this job. I want Virginians to learn

about my views and how I want to help lead Virginia into the 21st

century.''

HOUSE

2nd District

Owen B. Pickett's response: ``I don't. It's not part of my

campaign plan.''

John F. Tate's response: ``When an incumbent politician votes as

badly as Owen Pickett does, it's very important the voters hear

about it. But neither Pickett or any other incumbent is going to

spend his time and money telling people about his votes to fund more

social welfare spending at the expense of veterans and military

retirees, or his votes against a balanced budget amendment and the

line-item veto. Although Pickett knows that his voting record is out

of step with the Second District, it's not in his interests to

publicize it. The people need to know, and the incumbent won't tell

them the plain truth. Thus, it falls to the challenger to tell the

people what their congressman has been doing.''

3rd District

Robert C. Scott's response: ``An incumbent's campaign should

offer a description of an incumbent's record, with an indication

they will do the same in the future. If an incumbent has done a good

job he ought to run a positive campaign.''

Elsie Goodwyn Holland's response: ``It's possible to run a

positive campaign. You can do a comparison without being negative.

You can be matter of fact.''

4th District

Norman Sisisky's response: ``People say that an incumbent has

certain advantages. And that's certainly true. I guess we've dealt

with 100,000 people in cases. But also, an opponent has the

opportunity to criticize the incumbent's voting record, that the

opponent doesn't have. And that's where you get into negative

advertising. But I would hope to run a positive campaign. When I do

a commercial, I do it myself. I just talk and tell people what I

believe. And I tell people, `What you see is what you get with me.'

''

Anthony J. Zevgolis' response: ``It's easier, obviously, for

incumbents to present a program. But when you're a challenger,

you're faced with a dilemma. You have to give the voters a reason to

fire the incumbent, while at the same time give them a reason to

hire you. So you have to point out the flaws in someone else's plan.

I mean, I could just present my plan. But unfortunately, because of

voter apathy, it almost becomes a necessity to point out the flaws

in another person's plan, and then tell them why your plan would

work better. But certainly, if you stay to the issues and don't

personally attack someone's character and their own personal

reputation, that's OK.''

KEYWORDS: SENATE RACE VIRGINIA CONGRESSIONAL RACE

CANDIDATES by CNB