The Virginian-Pilot
                             THE VIRGINIAN-PILOT 
              Copyright (c) 1996, Landmark Communications, Inc.

DATE: Thursday, October 3, 1996             TAG: 9610030378
SECTION: LOCAL                   PAGE: B1   EDITION: FINAL 
SERIES: DECISION '96
SOURCE: David Poole
                                            LENGTH:  178 lines

MEMO TO VIRGINIA VOTERS

ILLUSTRATION: Graphic

Memo to Virginia voters

From: Staff writer David M. Poole

Re: Who's paying the candidates' way in the U.S. Senate campaign?

The campaign finance headline of the Warner vs. Warner contest

reads: ``John taps special interests; Mark digs into own pocket.''

A computer analysis of campaign finances in the U.S. Senate race

in Virginia confirms this basic storyline - and yields a few

surprises.

U.S. Sen. John Warner is the third-largest recipient of money

from political action committees among Senate candidates this year.

His seniority (18 years) and prime committees (Agriculture, Armed

Services, Transportation) make him attractive to corporate interests

plying the halls of Congress.

His PAC contributors include the National Cotton Council, Florida

Sugar Cane League, Lockheed Corp., General Dynamics.

Some business interests backing Warner have skirted federal

campaign limits - $5,000 for PACs, $2,000 for individuals - by

having a slew of employees give money at the same time.

This perfectly legal practice, known as bundling, netted Warner

these windfalls:

$43,950 from employees of two apparel makers headed by Linda J.

Wachner of New York. A spokesman said the employees gave money

because Wachner was a co-host of a gala fund-raiser for Warner at

the Four Seasons Hotel.

$19,000 from executives at Newport News Shipbuilding, a major

Virginia employer to whom Warner steers defense contracts.

$18,000 from employees and family members of South Florida sugar

baron Jose ``Pepe'' Fanjul, looking to impress upon Warner, a new

member of the Senate Agriculture Committee, the need to continue

sugar price supports.

Democrat Mark Warner keeps his long-shot challenge of John Warner

flush with checks drawn upon his personal checking account, which is

backed by a

cellular telephone fortune of at least $100 million.

Mark Warner has jumped on the Republican for taking so much

special interest money. The catch-line in a Mark Warner TV

commercial is: ``John Warner - plenty of time to listen to the

special interests and the lobbyists, but not enough time to listen

to us.''

The fact is, however, that John Warner's fund-raising base is

grounded more in Virginia than Mark Warner's supporters.

John Warner got 61 percent of his individual contributions from

Virginians through June 30, the most recent reporting period. Only

40 percent of Mark Warner's individual contributions came from

Virginians.

John Warner commands the loyalty of ``Main Street'' business

leaders in South Hampton Roads. John Warner has raised $125,630 in

the region, nearly 10 times more than Mark Warner. Business leaders

backing John Warner include Joshua P. Darden, Norfolk civic leader,

$2,000; Leonard Strelitz, Haynes Furniture, $2,000; David R. Goode,

Norfolk Southern Corp., $1,000; Ron Dozoretz, First Hospital Corp.

and former vice chairman of state Democratic Party, $1,000.

Ironically, Mark Warner's wealth makes it difficult for him to

raise money. The Democrat admits that supporters who might be

willing to contribute figure he can simply write himself another

check. He footed three-quarters of the cost of his campaign through

June.

His personal funds have allowed him to control the airwaves all

summer with $3 million worth of TV advertising.

Mark Warner is in no danger of becoming another Michael

Huffington, the California financier who put $28 million of his own

money in a losing Senate campaign two years ago. But it's not

inconceivable that Mark Warner could end up spending $8 million - or

more.

His friends in the mobile telecommunications industry have been

his most reliable contributors. Most of these backers live outside

Virginia and work for firms with futuristic names like Sygnet,

Skywire and Globatel.

``It's like a family network,'' said Anita Rimler, his campaign

manager, ``and all these people know Mark.''

Memo to Virginia voters

From: Staff writer David M. Poole

Re: Who's paying the candidates' way in the U.S. Senate campaign?

The campaign finance headline of the Warner vs. Warner contest

reads: ``John taps special interests; Mark digs into own pocket.''

A computer analysis of campaign finances in the U.S. Senate race

in Virginia confirms this basic storyline - and yields a few

surprises.

U.S. Sen. John Warner is the third-largest recipient of money

from political action committees among Senate candidates this year.

His seniority (18 years) and prime committees (Agriculture, Armed

Services, Transportation) make him attractive to corporate interests

plying the halls of Congress.

His PAC contributors include the National Cotton Council, Florida

Sugar Cane League, Lockheed Corp., General Dynamics.

Some business interests backing Warner have skirted federal

campaign limits - $5,000 for PACs, $2,000 for individuals - by

having a slew of employees give money at the same time.

This perfectly legal practice, known as bundling, netted Warner

these windfalls:

$43,950 from employees of two apparel makers headed by Linda J.

Wachner of New York. A spokesman said the employees gave money

because Wachner was a co-host of a gala fund-raiser for Warner at

the Four Seasons Hotel.

$19,000 from executives at Newport News Shipbuilding, a major

Virginia employer to whom Warner steers defense contracts.

$18,000 from employees and family members of South Florida sugar

baron Jose ``Pepe'' Fanjul, looking to impress upon Warner, a new

member of the Senate Agriculture Committee, the need to continue

sugar price supports.

Democrat Mark Warner keeps his long-shot challenge of John Warner

flush with checks drawn upon his personal checking account, which is

backed by a cellular telephone fortune of at least $100 million.

Mark Warner has jumped on the Republican for taking so much

special interest money. The catch-line in a Mark Warner TV

commercial is: ``John Warner - plenty of time to listen to the

special interests and the lobbyists, but not enough time to listen

to us.''

The fact is, however, that John Warner's fund-raising base is

grounded more in Virginia than Mark Warner's supporters.

John Warner got 61 percent of his individual contributions from

Virginians through June 30, the most recent reporting period. Only

40 percent of Mark Warner's individual contributions came from

Virginians.

John Warner commands the loyalty of ``Main Street'' business

leaders in South Hampton Roads. John Warner has raised $125,630 in

the region, nearly 10 times more than Mark Warner. Business leaders

backing John Warner include Joshua P. Darden, Norfolk civic leader,

$2,000; Leonard Strelitz, Haynes Furniture, $2,000; David R. Goode,

Norfolk Southern Corp., $1,000; Ron Dozoretz, First Hospital Corp.

and former vice chairman of state Democratic Party, $1,000.

Ironically, Mark Warner's wealth makes it difficult for him to

raise money. The Democrat admits that supporters who might be

willing to contribute figure he can simply write himself another

check. He footed three-quarters of the cost of his campaign through

June.

His personal funds have allowed him to control the airwaves all

summer with $3 million worth of TV advertising.

Mark Warner is in no danger of becoming another Michael

Huffington, the California financier who put $28 million of his own

money in a losing Senate campaign two years ago. But it's not

inconceivable that Mark Warner could end up spending $8 million - or

more.

His friends in the mobile telecommunications industry have been

his most reliable contributors. Most of these backers live outside

Virginia and work for firms with futuristic names like Sygnet,

Skywire and Globatel.

``It's like a family network,'' said Anita Rimler, his campaign

manager, ``and all these people know Mark.''

In State/Out of State -- Contributions from individuals who gave

$200 or more

John Warner Mark Warner

Va 971,609 61 % 245,988 40%

Out State 625,365 39 % 363,087 60%

Total $1,596,974 609,075

TOP FIVE STATES -- Contributions from individuals who gave $200

or more

John Warner Mark Warner

VA 971,609 VA 245,988

NY 124,800 DC 68,602

DC 123,090 MD 51,200

MD 68,665 MASS 41,600

FL 56,050 NY 33,750

WHERE MONEY COMES FROM -- All contributors of $200 or more

John Warner Mark Warner

Individuals 65 % Individuals 25%

PACS 29 % PACS 0%

Candidate 6 % Candidate 75%

JOHN WARNER'S TOP PAC MONEY -- By Industry Sector

Banks and Finance 142,157

Defense 123,964

Energy and Natural Resources 103,250

Transportation 88,850

Agriculture 75,467

Contributions made from Jan. 1, 1995 through June 30, 1996.

Source: Federal Election Commission, National Library on Money

and Politics. by CNB