The Virginian-Pilot
                             THE VIRGINIAN-PILOT 
              Copyright (c) 1997, Landmark Communications, Inc.

DATE: Tuesday, February 11, 1997            TAG: 9702110233
SECTION: FRONT                   PAGE: A1   EDITION: FINAL 
SOURCE: BY WARREN FISKE, STAFF WRITER 
DATELINE: RICHMOND                          LENGTH:   61 lines

VA. LAWMAKERS CONCEDE THEY MAY HAVE TO REDRAW DISTRICT

Virginia congressmen urged state officials Monday not to appeal the court ruling that struck down the state's only black-majority congressional district as unconstitutional.

Eight of Virginia's 11 representatives and two U.S. senators met with Gov. George F. Allen for four hours Monday in a session that was planned long before last Friday's federal court ruling that the 3rd Congressional District was racially gerrymandered.

``I firmly believe that it would serve no useful purpose to launch an appeal,'' said Rep. Herbert H. Bateman, R-1st District, as he left the executive mansion. ``That seemed to be a pretty widely held sentiment.''

Del. Robert C. Scott, who has occupied the 3rd District seat since its inception in 1992 and is the only African American whom Virginia has elected to Congress this century, agreed.

``I think we should see what the possibilities are of making minor revisions,'' Scott said. ``If that's not possible, then we could consider an appeal.''

A panel of three federal judges ruled that state legislators illegally relied only on racial considerations in creating the 3rd District, which has a 62 percent black voting-age population.

The district meanders 225 miles through portions of Norfolk, Portsmouth and Suffolk all the way north through Essex County with tentacles reaching into black precincts of Richmond and Petersburg. The judges ordered that the district be redrawn before the next congressional elections in 1998.

The decision made Virginia the sixth state whose congressional boundaries have been overturned since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled last year that federal laws do not require the creation of minority districts whenever possible. Instead, the courts have ruled that drawing geographically compact and contiguous districts is more important.

State Attorney General James S. Gilmore III has not decided whether to press an appeal, although many state legislators and congressmen believe such an effort would be fruitless.

A scheduled meeting Monday between Gilmore and state legislators to discuss options was postponed. Lawmakers said Gilmore asked for a delay because he needed more time to study the ruling. A spokesman for Gilmore said the meeting was put off by legislators.

``We can't do anything until we find out whether there will be an appeal, and that could take the better part of the spring,'' said Del. Marian Van Landingham, D-Alexandria, the chairwoman of the House Privileges and Elections Committee.

But Sen. Kevin G. Miller, R-Harrisonburg - chairman of the Senate Privileges and Elections Committee - said he hoped the case would not be appealed and that the General Assembly could offer a redistricting plan this spring.

``I haven't heard anyone express a desire to take this thing any further in court,'' he said. ILLUSTRATION: Color photo by AP

[U..S Rep. Robert C. Scott]

Graphic

Area Shown: [For complete copy, see microfilm]

KEYWORDS: 3RD CONFRESSIONAL DISTRICT UNCONSTITUTIONAL


by CNB