DATE: Monday, August 18, 1997 TAG: 9708180152 SECTION: FRONT PAGE: A4 EDITION: FINAL TYPE: Focus SOURCE: By Michelle Locke ASSOCIATED PRESS LENGTH: 113 lines
this date.] ILLUSTRATION: Willie Lloyd Turner
Crime: Murder
Time on death row: 15 years
GRAPHIC
Willie Lloyd Turner inhabited Virginia's death row longer than
any other inmate in modern times. He was executed by lethal
injection on May 25, 1995, after a 15-year wait on death row. Turner
was sentenced to death for the killing of William J. ``Jack'' Smith
Jr., a Franklin jewelry store owner.
Some highlights of Turner's effort to avoid execution:
He appealed four times through state courts and four times
through the federal court system.
He was taken to the death house three times to await execution,
in 1980, 1987 and 1990.
On May 13, 1985, Turner was within four hours of the electric
chair, when he was granted a stay by the U.S. Supreme Court. He
lived another 10 years on death row.
Originally scheduled to die in Virginia's electric chair, Turner
was on death row when the state began carrying out executions by
lethal injection.
Two of Smith's relatives were the first victims' relatives
allowed to watch an execution in Virginia.
JOSEPH ROGER O'DELL
Crime: Murder, rape
Time on death row: 12 years
[TIMELINE]
The case of Joseph Roger O'Dell, who was executed in Virginia in
July, generated 12 years of appeals. His odyssey through the legal
system was typical of the length of time inmates could avoid
execution.
Some of the details of his life of crime and his legal fight:
1965
A Roanoke native who grew up in Norfolk's Ocean View, O'Dell had
served time in prison and was sentenced to 20 years for killing a
fellow inmate.
1975
Sentenced in Florida to 114 years for robbery, assault and
abduction of a 23-year-old Zippy Mart clerk, Donna Doyle. Doyle
testified that he put a gun to her head, beat her with it and
threatened to rape her.
1985
On parole from Florida, O'Dell was arrested for the rape and
murder of Helen Schartner in Virginia Beach.
1986
Representing himself in one of the most expensive trials of its
time, O'Dell appeared in court 29 times and filed 179 motions before
the trial even began.
1988
O'Dell writes to a millionaire philanthropist saying he needs
money to pay for DNA testing to prove his innocence.
1989
Citing the circumstantial nature of the case, a judge allows
O'Dell to use new DNA technology to test the bloody clothing. Two
blood stains found on O'Dell's clothes were tested for DNA. Blood
from one stain did not match O'Dell's or Schartner's. The second,
originally regarded as a match with Schartner's blood, is in
dispute because the testing method has been discarded as unreliable.
1991
U.S. Supreme Court upholds his conviction but suggests that a
lower court consider the case because ``evidence raises serious
questions about whether he was guilty of the charged crime . . . or
capable of representing himself.''
1992
A U.S. District Court judge ruled that O'Dell should get a new
sentencing based on the idea that criminal defendants have the right
to counteract prosecutorial claims of future dangerousness with
information about their ineligibility for parole.
1996
In July, Sister Helen Prejean steps forward to support O'Dell.
The U.S. Court of Appeals 4th Circuit rejects O'Dell's claim that he
has new DNA evidence that proves his innocence. The court splits
7-6 on the truth-in-sentencing idea. In November, an Italian protest
begins bubbling. Pope John Paul II asks for clemency for O'Dell. In
December, the U.S. Supreme Court stays O'Dell's Dec. 18 execution
in order to fully explore a legal point in the case.
1997
June: U.S. Supreme Court rules (5-4) that O'Dell got a fair trial
and should die for his crime.
July: O'Dell is executed.
SHORTENING THE WAIT
The Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,
approved after nearly 20 years of congressional debate on federal
appeals reform, toughened standards for federal court review of
death penalty cases, set strict time limits for appeals and curbed
repeat petitions to federal courts.
One provision bars a convicted state defendant from beginning a
second round of federal appeals without authorization from a
three-judge appellate panel - and makes it difficult for the panel
to allow a prisoner's petition to be heard.
Moreover, the law does not permit inmates to appeal to the U.S.
Supreme Court after the panel spurns their petitions. KEYWORDS: CAPITAL PUNISHMENT DEATH ROW
Send Suggestions or Comments to
webmaster@scholar.lib.vt.edu |