DATE: Friday, October 10, 1997 TAG: 9710101005 SECTION: DAILY BREAK PAGE: E15 EDITION: FINAL LENGTH: 45 lines
I think people need things to strive for other than sports. But
also, in some cases, there are kids who have nothing to strive for
in school, they have a bad home life or whatever. . . . But the only
thing they come to school for is the sports. And they need the
sports to maybe relieve some stress from them. Jonathan Felumlee,
16, junior
I think they should raise it, because 2.0 - a `C' average - is
still not good enough. . . . If you can't concentrate on your work
and do good in academics, then what makes you think you can get out
there and do sports? . . . I really think they should raise it to
2.5. Keisha Jones, 17, senior
If you can't hold up the responsibility of making good grades in
class, then you shouldn't be able to hold up the responsibility of
being part of a team. For those who can't make a 2.0, that's bad. I
know some people try really hard and still can't receive a 2.0, but
academics come first. That's it.'' Kelly Brown, 17, senior
It gives students a goal that they need to reach, so they strive
for excellence. . . . If they can play sports without having to
have a specific grade-point average, it doesn't give them anything
to strive for. Amanda Slingerland, 15, junior
I feel that it's bad. Because you have too many potential
athletes and potential life success stories . . . to take away
something that people strive for. People try as hard as they can,
and maybe they just don't cut it at a 2.0. . . . But they stay in
school and do the sports and they can get up near what they can do.
Chris Hunter, 17, senior
It's a good thing, because you have to be special to be on a
team. . . . Not everybody can just come out there and be on a team.
It's the cream of the crop. . . . You can still go to college with
that `C' average. Aubrey Everett, 17, senior
Send Suggestions or Comments to
webmaster@scholar.lib.vt.edu |