JARS v57n3 - Notes on Selected Illustrations from J. G. Millais' Two Volumes Rhododendrons and The Various Hybrids, Part IV
Notes on Selected Illustrations from J. G. Millais' Two
Volumes Rhododendrons and The Various Hybrids, Part IV
Clive L. Justice
Vancouver, British Columbia
Canada
R. campylocarpum
R. fortunei x R. thomsonii , R. 'King George'. |
R. campylocarpum
,
R. fortunei
x
R. thomsonii
,
R.
'King George'.
This coloured plate of three trusses from Millais, 1917, a watercolour by Winifred Walker, shows at top a
full rounded truss of clear yellow
Rhododendron campylocarpum
. It is probably from the primrose
yellow-flowered taller plant form they had in Cornwall and Devon than from the sulphur yellow-flowered
lower bush form that J. D. Hooker described and saw in South Lodge from Reuthe in Germany. Writing in
the
Rhododendron Society Notes
, J. G. Millais took it on himself to propose a distinction between
the light yellow tall
R. camplyocarpum
and the darker yellow smaller plant that Hooker had
described when he found it in Sikkim. He suggested the tall growing, pale flowered plant be named
R.
camplyocarpum
var.
pallidum
(RSN Vol. II Part II, 1921). On the Sikkim 2000 trek at an area
in the Teesta River Valley well above Lachen, possibly between Yongdi and Gogong, we observed a cluster
of big tall rhododendrons covered with yellow flowers on the west side of the valley. Unfortunately we
were away across on the east side of the river from them and much too far to make any kind of
identification. They might well have been Millais'
camplyocarpum
var.
pallidum
(Justice
2000).
The middle truss of Winnifred Walker's painting is
Rhododendron fortunei
x
R. thomsonii
.
'Luscombei' was probably the first named hybrid of this cross named for Mr. Luscombe who introduced it
in the mid Victorian period. However, as Millais relates, "Recently Sir Edmund Loder has made the same
cross, and the result is a much handsomer plant with larger leaves and flower...two seedlings have
flowered" (Millais 1917). Most probably the pictured pink truss is one of Sir Edmund's crosses. The
lower truss, R. 'King George', is more than likely named for the reigning monarch during the teens,
1920s and 1930s, George V. George became King in 1912 after the death of his father King Edward the
VII. It was introduced by the Dutch Nursery, C. B. van Nes & Sons, after 1917 and before 1922. Millais
describes it as: "Fine large red, slightly tender" (Millais 2nd series, 1924). Slightly tender
indicates Salley and Greer's listing of R. 'King George' as unknown rhododendron x
R.
griffithianum
and is right in listing it as a cross made by Otto Schultz, the Berlin porcelain
factory gardener. However Schultz sold all his
griffithianum
crosses to C. B. van Ness in 1902
(Leach) who had to have named it and introduced it after 1912 when King George V came to the throne,
not in 1896 as stated in Salley and Greer. 'Loderi King George' is an entirely different rhododendron
hybrid. It is blush white and has a four-star rating while the pictured red 'King George' gets only
one star.
R. discolor
var.
Kirkii
- Garden Hybrid
R. oreotrephes , R. insigne |
R. discolor
var.
Kirkii
- Garden Hybrid,
R. oreotrephes
,
R. insigne
Lillian Snelling's painting of
Rhododendron discolor
var.
Kirkii
x Garden Hybrid at top,
R. oreotrephes
at lower left and
R. insigne
at lower right. In the Vol. 1, Part IV,
1919 issue of
The Rhododendron Society Notes
, W. J. Bean of Kew Gardens wrote a report on the
Fortunei group of rhododendrons that included
R. discolor
(syn.
R. Kirkii
Hort; now
classified as
R. fortunei
ssp.
discolor
). Bean writes of discolor:
Of the Fortunei group it is in my opinion the finest...it has the largest flowers of all the Fortunei
group1. Under the name of R. Kirkii there is in a few gardens a rhododendron belonging to the
Fortune
i
group. We have it at Kew, and Mr. Millais mentions it in his book, on page 169,
as having flowered in his garden in 1915. I do not know how the name originated; I cannot find that
one such has ever been published, but I suspect it originated in Messrs. Veitch's nursery at Coombe
Wood, probably as a provisional name then thought to be distinct
2
. Although I have not
seen it in flower, I feel certain that it is nothing but
R. discolor
. The leaves match those
of that species and it flowered with Mr. Millais in July, which is the season of
R. discolor
and not that of R. Houlstonii with which he compares it. Moreover, the Wilson numbers given by Mr.
Millais, viz., 885 and 885B, are those of R. discolor.
However, Millais sticks to his guns with var.
Kirkii
in his Second Series, published five years
later. In the Species and Hybrids chapter under R. DISCOLOR,
R. Kirkii
Hort., is legitimized by
adding in parenthesizes (from a single plant in Veitch Nursery, Coombe Wood). And after the long
description and argument that Bean discounts above, he writes on the hybrids produced with it and
garden hybrids of which the illustration is one.
The first successful hybrids of this species (
R. Kirkii
Hort.) and late flowering garden hybrids
was created by Mr. G. Harrow, of the firm of J. Veitch and Sons at Coombe Wood about twelve years
ago. Most of the crosses went to Mr. J. C. Williams at Caerhays, but I purchased eight examples and
Mr. Slocock had a few. These are all splendid hardy hybrids of good colour from white to deep rose
(generally spotted). They flower in good shaped large trusses from late May til July and make a
pleasant show at this season when rhododendrons are scarce. They are most variable in their time of
flowering and often disappoint one in coming into bloom too early when there is already a wealth of
flowers but on the whole they are good value, being hardy, beautiful and very floriferous...I grow a
few in quite exposed places with some success but they do better in a wood.
Lillian Snelling's painting is undoubtedly of one of the eight that Millais purchased from Veitch.
A deep rose, it is certainly spotted as she depicts or rather a dark blotch or flash. If it were not
for the narrow leaves you could be viewing 'Mrs G. W. Leak'. It seems crossing discolor with garden
hybrids was quite popular at the time, even Kew Gardens did it
3
.
The Chinese species
Rhododendron oreotrephes
and
R. insigne
had been introduced to
England prior to the WW I, the latter by Wilson in 1910 from Mt. Wa, Sichuan Province, and the
former by Forrest in 1914 from Lichiang ranges, then also in Sichuan Province. There is a
collotype of
R. insigne
as a dwarf plant
4
in Millais, Second Series, photographed
in the C. Scrace-Dickins garden, Coolhurst, Sussex. It is from this plant of
R. insigne
that
truss was taken for the painting of it by Miss Snelling.
Rhododendron oreotrephes
as painted
is probably the most typical flower colour and truss size of a very variable species. There are at
ten synonyms. Cox lists ten colour forms, and in the wild and cultivation heights are from 1.0 5m to
7.6 m. On a personal note I have a
R. oreotrephes
seedling raised from RHS seed (1956) that
has a perfect cone truss of pale mauve flowers. It has consistently bloomed in late May for forty
years, and might have reached 7.6 m but I keep it cut back to 2-2.5m in my leggy Triflorum thicket.
Except for the white edged petals, my
oreotrephes
flowers match those painted by Miss Snelling.
The mauve matches 'Countess of Athlone'.
So we can deduce Miss Snelling has painted three rhododendrons that must have been in bloom at much
the same time: late May or early June.
End Notes
1
Bean's Fortunei group consisted of
RR. fortunei, houlstonii, decorum, discolor,
hemsleyanum, serotinum, vernicosum
and
auriculatum
.
2
A very common nursery practice.
3
In the Rhododendron Society Notes, W. J. Bean concludes his discussion of
discolor
with the following: "Several crosses with
discolor
as one parent have been made at Kew,
chiefly with such garden varieties as 'Pink Pearl', 'Strategist', 'Doncaster', 'Memoir', etc. But
it has also been hybridized with some species -
griffithianum
(Auklandii),
maximum
and
occidentale
, the last of course an azalea."
4
Millais quotes Wilson as saying it grows from 4 to 6 m in the wild and Cox in The Larger Species
says 1.5 to 3.7 m in cultivation, listing it as lime tolerant, late flowering and one of the best pinks.