VPIEJ-L 09/93
VPIEJ-L Discussion Archives
September 1993
========================================================================= Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1993 10:12:01 EDT Reply-To: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> Sender: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> From: Stevan Harnad <harnad@princeton.edu> Subject: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON REFEREED ELECTRONIC JOURNALS Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1993 12:58:03 -0500 (CDT) From: Helga Dyck <umih@cc.umanitoba.ca> INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON REFEREED ELECTRONIC JOURNALS: Towards a Consortium for Networked Publications PRELIMINARY PROGRAMME October 1-2, 1993 (Friday & Saturday) The Delta Winnipeg Hotel 288 Portage Avenue Winnipeg, Manitoba R3C 0B8 Sponsored by: Medical Research Council Natural Sciences & Engineering Research Council Social Science & Humanities Research Council of Canada The University of Manitoba The University of Manitoba INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON REFEREED ELECTRONIC JOURNALS: Towards a Consortium for Networked Publications The Internet is a major new medium for dissemination of research, and it is vital that the scholarly community become acquainted with the enormous potential of the Internet for scholarship. Commercial companies are already devoting attention to developing computer network publication projects. It is imperative that the scholarly community not leave this major medium to be developed solely by commercial interests. The aims of the conference are: *to make academic merit the sole consideration in the publication of journal-type research; *to advance the idea that the academic community should have a hand in determining what gets published and how it is disseminated; *to provide an outlet of research publication that is not subject to the severe economic constraints of traditional paper-journal publishing; *to make collective use of the scholarly advantages of network publication(savings in production costs, speed-up in publication and dissemination process); *to provide an effective and low-cost means for universities to play a greater role as disseminators of research information, and not only as producers and consumers. This historic two-day event is organized as a series of plenary working sessions that will include presentations from major resource people from a variety of fields. It will include an exhibit and demonstration of the latest in computer technology for long distance data transfer as it applies to electronic journals, with an emphasis on text, image and sound signal processing and compression. Registration is limited to 200 participants. PRELIMINARY PROGRAMME Thursday, September 30, 1993 18:00 Pre-Registration, 11th floor foyer, Delta Winnipeg Hotel Friday, October 1, 1993 9:00 Welcome ARNOLD NAIMARK, President, University of Manitoba 9:15 Session 1: The Nature, Advantages and Disadvantages of Electronic Journal Publication Opening and Chair: LARRY HURTADO, Religion, Univ Manitoba Portrait of the Electronic Journals World ANN OKERSON, Association of Research Libraries The Economics of Journal Publication Speaker T.B.A. 10:40 Break 11:00 Session 2: Practical Implementations: Editing and Production Editing and Producing Surfaces: Flexible Designs for Shifting Objectives JEAN-CLAUDE GUEDON, Comparative Literature, University of Montreal Investigations in Electronic Delivery of Chemical Information LORRIN R. GARSON, American Chemical Society Editing an Electronic Journal: One Foot in the Past, One Hand in the Future EDWARD J. HUTH, American Association for the Advancement of Science 12:30 Lunch 13:30 Session 3: Practical Implementations: The Distribution of Electronic Journals Current Trends in the Distribution of Networked-Based Electronic Journals MICHAEL STRANGELOVE, Religious Studies, University of Ottawa So we have this great electronic journal, now what? JOHN BLACK, Chief Librarian, University of Guelph A Model for Producing, Delivering and Consuming Refereed Electronic Journals TIMOTHY D. STEPHEN and TERESA M. HARRISON, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 14:50 Break 15:10 Session 4: Issues of Quality Implementing Peer Review on the Net: Scientific Quality Control in Scholarly Electronic Journals STEVAN HARNAD, Laboratoire Cognition et Mouvement CNRS, Univ. Aix-Marseille The Future Place of Electronic Media Publication in the Evaluation of Faculty, Research and Scholarship JAMES GARDNER, Vice-President (Academic) & Provost, University of Manitoba 16:30 Question Period 18:00 Dinner Saturday, October 2, 1993 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. Exhibit: A demonstration of the latest in computer technology for long distance data transfer as it applies to electronic journals, with particular emphasis on text, image and sound signal processing and compression. 9:00 Session 5: Legal Issues Copyright Protection or Copyright Sharing: Two Alternative Legal Models for Management of and Access to Electronic Journals JENNIFER BANKIER, Dalhousie Law School Electronic Journals: Abolishing the Legal Impediments DENIS S. MARSHALL, Faculty of Law, Queen's University Electronic Journals: Defining the Relationships ROBERT FRANSON, Faculty of Law, University of British Columbia 10:20 Break 10:40 Session 6: Changing Technology for Information Access I Adobe Acrobat - The Electronic Journal Catalyst? Speaker T.B.A. Video Processing for Multimedia Speaker T.B.A. Interactive Images for Electronic Journals Speaker T.B.A. 12:00 Lunch 13:00 Session 7: Changing Technology for Information Access II = The HyTime Document Language Speaker T.B.A. Speech Processing for Electronic Journals Speaker T.B.A. New Techniques for Text, Image and Sound Compression WITOLD KINSNER, Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Manitoba 14:30 Question Period 15:10 Break 15:30 Session 8: Whither Hence? Summary of Proceedings LARRY W. HURTADO, Religion, University of Manitoba 17:00 Conference closes -------------------------------------------------------------- Registration Information Fees: If paid by September 1, 1993: $150.00 (Cdn) If paid after September 1, 1993: $200.00 (Cdn) Dinner for Guests of participants: $30.00 (Cdn) An "ice-breaker" session will be held after our Pre-Registration on September 30. A banquet is also being planned for the evening of Friday, October 1. Costs for both events are included in the registration fee. Participants are responsible for all other meals. Requests for information or the completed Conference Registration Form together with payment should be sent to: Co-ordinator Institute for Humanities University of Manitoba Room 108 Isbister Building Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2 FAX: (204) 275-5781 Phone: (204) 474-9599 E-Mail: umih@ccu.umanitoba.ca Accommodation The Conference will be held in the Manitoba Room at the Delta Winnipeg Hotel conveniently located downtown. The facilities at the Delta include a fitness centre, a heated indoor pool, a sauna area, etc. Restaurants in all price ranges are within easy walking distance. We have arranged an attractive hotel rate of $65/night, which is the same for either single or double occupancy.Taxi service from the airport to the hotel is approximately $11.00. The City of Winnipeg Winnipeg is a city with a population of more than 600,000. In early October the weather is cool but pleasant, with the temperatures usually averaging 10=F8C. (50=F8F.) during the day. Winnipeg is the home of the world famous Royal Winnipeg Ballet and has its own Symphony Orchestra. It also has an IMAX Theatre, an Art Gallery, a Planetarium, and a Theatre Centre. Other attractions include the Winnipeg Mint, Assiniboia Downs, the Winnipeg Blue Bombers, a European-style casino,and many parks. By Air Canadian Airlines International has been selected as "the official airline" for our Conference. For those attending from points in Canada, Canadian is offering 15% off the full economy fare. Should you qualify for advanced purchase fares, Canadian is offering a 5% discount off published year-round excursion fares (within Canada only). Contact Canadian Airlines' Conventionair Office (1-800-665-5554) or your travel agent, and be sure to mention number 4369. Acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of the following organizations in making this Conference possible: * Humanities Federation of Canada * Association of Research Libraries * Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers * Canadian Association of Learned Journals * Social Science Federation of Canada * Legal Research Institute The University of Manitoba CONFERENCE REGISTRATION FORM Last Name First Name = Title (Prof./Dr./Mr./Mrs./Ms.) Preferred Name for Name Badge= Organization = Address = City Province/State Country Postal Code Business Telephone No. Residence Telephone No. E-mail/FAX No. = Meals: Special Dietary Requirements (specify) = (e.g., diabetic, vegetarian, etc.) = Banquet Preference = Choice of: Salmon [ ] Beef [ ] Other Requirements: (e.g., physical handicap, etc.) Please specify. Fees: (including GST) Before September 1, 1993 $150.00 (Cdn) After September 1, 1993: $200.00 (Cdn) Dinner for Guest: $ 30.00 (Cdn) Please make your cheque or money order payable to The University of Manitoba. Registrations must be accompanied by full payment of registration fees. All fees are payable in Canadian funds. For practical reasons, enrolment is limited to 200 participants. Cancellation: Requests for a full refund must be received by September 15, 1993. No refunds will be made after this date. Travel Arrangements: Canadian Airlines International has been selected as "the official carrier" for our Conference. For those attending from points in Canada, Canadian is offering 15% off the full economy fare. Should you qualify for advanced purchase fares, Canadian is offering a 5% discount off published year-round excursion fares (within Canada only). Contact Canadian Airlines Conventionair Office (1-800-665-5554) or your travel agent, and be sure to mention Convention Number 4369. Further inquiries may be directed to: Co-ordinator, Institute for the Humanities, University of Manitoba, Room 108 Isbister Bldg., Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 2N2, Canada. [Telephone: (204) 474-9599; FAX: (204) 275- 5781; E-mail: umih@ccu.umanitoba.ca.] G.S.T. Registration Number: R119260669. ========================================================================= Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1993 12:23:24 EDT Reply-To: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> Sender: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> From: James Powell <jpowell@vtvm1.bitnet> Subject: VPIEJ-L Resources VPIEJ-L Resources These resources provide access to the VPIEJ-L list and/or archives of VPIEJ-L posts. Additional files relevant to electronic journal publishing are available at the FTP, Gopher, Listserv and WWW sites. FTP Archive: The Scholarly Communications Project of Virginia Tech has an anonymous FTP archive which includes the VPIEJ-L archive, along with many electronic texts and electronic publishing utilities. To access this site, FTP to BORG.LIB.VT.EDU and login as userid anonymous. This FTP archive is available to the Gopher literate through the Gopher at gopher.micro.umn.edu. Select item 5, Internet file server (FTP) sites/, then item 2, Popular FTP Sites via Gopher/. Gopher Access: The FTP archive files are available via a Gopher+ server at borg.lib.vt.edu port 5070. VPIEJ-L files are in /pub/vpiej-l. Listserv Archive: There is a listserv archive available at listserv@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu (listserv@vtvm1 for BITNET) for VPIEJ-L. Send a command as the body of a mail message to get a current filelist: INDEX VPIEJ-L to listserv. Use the get command to retrieve items from the archive in a mail message: GET EJ-BIB TXT. Usenet Gateway: Subscribers may want to consider reading VPIEJ-L on Usenet. Check with your system administrator to see if your site receives bit.listserv.vpiej-l. If it does, you can unsubscribe your email account by sending a SIGNOFF VPIEJ-L command to listserv@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu. You will still be able to post to the list by email to vpiej-l@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu. If your site does not carry this group, please encourage them to add it. WAIS Source: The discussion logs for the VPIEJ-L list are searchable via WAIS. The wais source may be retrieved from the directory-of-servers by searching for VPIEJ-L, or by FTP to borg.lib.vt.edu in the pub/WAIS/sources directory. World Wide Web Access: Point your WWW or Xmosaic client at the Scholarly Communications Project page: http://borg.lib.vt.edu/z-borg/www/. There is a link to a hypertext version of the VPIEJ-L discussion archives, which are still under construction. There is also a link to the Usenet newsgroup bit.listserv.vpiej-l. ----------------------- VPIEJ-L@VTVM1 VPIEJ-L@VTVM1.CC.VT.EDU bit.listserv.vpiej-l VPIEJ-L is a discussion list for electronic publishing issues, especially those related to Scholarly Electronic Journals. Topics for discussion include SGML, PostScript, and other e-journal formats; as well as software and hardware considerations for creation of, storage, and access to e-journals. Publishers, editors, technical staff, programmers, librarians, and end-users are welcome to join. One goal of the list is to provide better feedback from users to creators, so we are very interested in receiving and archival issues. This should give those of us involved in publishing an idea as to what distribution methods work and how end-users are accessing and using these publications. Current readers of and contributors to VPIEJ-L have discussed readability and screen display, copyright, and advertising (noncommercial). Archives of VPIEJ-L are available. A listing may be retrieved by sending a command INDEX VPIEJ-L to LISTSERV@VTVM1. To subscribe, send the following command to LISTSERV@VTVM1 via mail or interactive message: SUB VPIEJ-L your_full_name where "your_full_name" is your name. For example: SUB VPIEJ-L Joan Doe Or you may read and post to VPIEJ-L via Usenet in the group bit.listserv.vpiej-l Owner: James Powell <jpowell@vtvm1> James Powell ... Library Automation, University Libraries, VPI&SU 1-4986 ... JPOWELL@VTVM1.CC.VT.EDU ... jpowell@borg.lib.vt.edu - NeXTMail welcome here ... Owner of VPIEJ-L, a discussion list for Electronic Journals Archives: http://borg.lib.vt.edu:80/ gopher://oldborg.lib.vt.edu:70/ file://borg.lib.vt.edu/~ftp ========================================================================= Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1993 16:06:32 EDT Reply-To: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> Sender: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> From: paulie@echonyc.com Subject: Where should we publish? <> Paul Blaser 06-SEP-93 14:24 paulie@echonyc I am the desktop publishing person for a non-profit research institute. We publish two family planning journals, one bi-monthly and the other quarterly, as well as a couple books each year. We also have databases full of relevant demographic information. We are looking into publishing at least one of the journals on the Internet, with an eye toward possibly making the rest of the publications and the databases avaliable in the future. Some of the decisions we are faced with include: Do we set our own machine up as an ftp site, or do we post the journal elsewhere (CICNet)? Should we limit ourselves to one site, or publish in a variety of places? Many of our articles are full of graphs. Do we provide these as GIFs, omit them, or handle them some other way? Should we post abstracts of articles on listserves, etc.? What is the etiquitte of this sort of thing. Any advice is welcome and appreciated. Paul Blaser Blaspf52@snyoneva.bitnet or paulie@echonyc.com ========================================================================= Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1993 09:05:48 EDT Reply-To: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> Sender: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> From: Carol Hutchins <hutchins@acf4.nyu.edu> Subject: Re: Where should we publish? In-Reply-To: </vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></jpowell@vtvm1></jpowell@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></umih@cc.umanitoba.ca></harnad@princeton.edu></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet>from "paulie@echonyc.com" at Sep 6, 93 04:06:32 pm > > > < </hutchins@acf4.nyu.edu></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet>> Paul Blaser 06-SEP-93 14:24 > paulie@echonyc > I am the desktop publishing person for a > non-profit research institute. > We publish two family planning journals, > one bi-monthly and the other quarterly, as > well as a couple books each year. We also > have databases full of relevant demographic > information. > > We are looking into publishing at least one > of the journals on the Internet, with an eye > toward possibly making the rest of the > publications and the databases avaliable in > the future. > > Some of the decisions we are faced with include: > Do we set our own machine up as an ftp site, > or do we post the journal elsewhere (CICNet)? > The people editing your new electronic journal should seriously look at trying to get the content of the publication reviewed and abstracted/indexed by the chief indexing services in the discipline, in your case, probably Sociological Abstracts, or the Social Science Index (H.W. Wilson, Inc.). This step seems to me to be an important one in getting the content of electronic scholarly publications viewed on the same plane as paper ones. The people working at the secondary publications are, of course, then faced with the question of how to cite them, indicate their length, format, etc, not to mention where the files are available. --Carol Hutchins NYU Courant Institute Library ========================================================================= Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1993 09:06:54 EDT Reply-To: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> Sender: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> From: "Hannah King." <kingh@snysyrv1.bitnet> Subject: Re: Complete ejournal archives I'd really love to flame back at Mr Moser for the use of "chipheads" which I take to be a put-down, however, I decided that poised, rational, calm, meditative, tolerant, and open discussion is far more important than adding to the "Men's War Over the Internet" (see PACS-L for _that_ discussion_). Question: Mr Moser, if archives are designed only to preserve why do they exist? For what purpose are they preserving anything? I know, Iknow you didn't actually mean they just preserve. But you did say that "Libraries exist to provide access. Libraries are not archives. Archives exist ... to preserve (?)." Another question: If libraries only exist to provide access ... what on earth do they provide access to ... ? Definition: archive -- a place in which public records or historical documents are preserved (libraries do archive public records and historical materials -- are electronic recp ords "public records?" could they some day be historical records?) archive (verb) -- to file or collect (hmmm, libraries do file and collect materials, don't they?) archpriest -- a priest of preeminent rank (archivists and librarians might want to avoid assuming the role of high priest/priestess in favor of a more science based practice). Question: Are electronic materials housed and maintained by volunteers worth preserving? If yes, when, where, and how? If not, what good are they? Are they even worth the time to find them, learn to access them, and access, read, and store them? Hannah King SUNY HSC Library at Syracuse 766 Irving Avenue Syracuse, NY 13210-2339 315-464-7109 315-464-7199 (fax) kingh@snysyrv1 kingh@vax.cs.hscsyr.edu ========================================================================= Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1993 17:29:03 EDT Reply-To: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> Sender: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> From: David Robison <drobison@library.berkeley.edu> Subject: Re: Where should we publish? < > Paul Blaser 06-SEP-93 14:24 paulie@echonyc > Some of the decisions we are faced with include: > Do we set our own machine up as an ftp site, > or do we post the journal elsewhere (CICNet)? I recommend both. Set up your own archive so you have complete control over at least one publicly accessible version. Have someone else keep a copy so that if your server is down or overwhelmed, another site is available. > Should we limit ourselves to one site, or publish > in a variety of places? See above. > Many of our articles are full of graphs. > Do we provide these as GIFs, omit them, or handle > them some other way? This is tough. You may want to consider offering an ASCII-only version with associated GIFs in addition to PostScript or PDF version. > Should we post abstracts of articles on listserves, etc.? > What is the etiquitte of this sort of thing. This would depend on the list. You may want to post the abstracts for the premier issue, then only by subscription. You probably should ask the list owner what is best for that list. David F. W. Robison Internet: drobison@library.berkeley.edu Editor, Current Cites Bitnet: drobison@ucblibra Information Systems Instruction & Support Voice: (510)643-9494 UC Berkeley Library Fax: (510)643-7891 Berkeley, CA 94720 ========================================================================= Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1993 17:31:31 EDT Reply-To: "Tansin A. Darcos & Company" <0005066432@MCIMAIL.COM> Sender: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> From: "Tansin A. Darcos & Company" <0005066432@MCIMAIL.COM> Subject: Re: Where should we publish? From: Paul Robinson <tdarcos@mcimail.com> Organization: Tansin A. Darcos & Company, Silver Spring, MD USA ----- Paul Blaser <paulie@echonyc.com>, writes: > I am the desktop publishing person for a non-profit research > institute. We publish two family planning journals, one > bi-monthly and the other quarterly ... We are looking into > publishing at least one of the journals on the Internet ... > Some of the decisions we are faced with include: > Do we set our own machine up as an ftp site... Should we > limit ourselves to one site, or publish in a variety of places? If you have the resources for connections and the space to store them. There are many "public" ftp sites that handle uploads, such as oak.oakland.edu which has the capacity to handle 400 simultaneous FTP requests. Some ftp sites are doing "mirroring". One site holds a file and others will copy it onto their site so as to duplicate it there. > Many of our articles are full of graphs. Do we provide > these as GIFs, omit them, or handle them some other way? You can use Postscript for text files that contain charts, graphs or other material. This also allows you to preseve fonts, sizes, special lettering, italic, etc. Unless the document is totally useless without the graph, I would suggest releasing it in two forms: the file name with the extension ".txt" for a plain ascii document of text only, and the Poscript format with everything as the same named file ending in ".ps". For example charging.txt charging.ps A file dealing with price charging for computer time. > Should we post abstracts of articles on listserves, etc.? > What is the etiquitte of this sort of thing. If you can find one that will put it up, may I suggest placing your files on Gopher servers that deal with the particular context. --- Paul Robinson - TDARCOS@MCIMAIL.COM ----- The following Automatic Fortune Cookie was selected only for this message: A lot of people I know believe in positive thinking, and so do I. I believe everything positively stinks. -- Lew Col ========================================================================= Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1993 08:24:12 EDT Reply-To: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> Sender: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> From: Pat Weaver-Meyers <qb1211@uokmvsa.bitnet> Subject: pub titled "Surfaces" I'm having problems retrieving an electronic publication entitled: Surfaces. OCLC bib record indicates an address of harfang.cc.umontreal.ca. However, I can't get in at that address and can't find it at castor.iro.umontreal.ca. Does anyone on this list know where this journal is archived or how it is listed at Univ. of Montreal?? Please respond to me at: patwm@uoknor.edu Thanks in advance. Pat Weaver-Meyers Univ of Oklahoma ========================================================================= Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1993 10:13:33 EDT Reply-To: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> Sender: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> From: Guedon Jean-Claude <guedon@ere.umontreal.ca> Subject: Re: pub titled "Surfaces" In-Reply-To: <199309101236.AA18641@condor.CC.UMontreal.CA> from "Pat Weaver-Meyers" at Sep 10, 93 08:24:12 am > > I'm having problems retrieving an electronic publication entitled: Surfaces. > OCLC bib record indicates an address of harfang.cc.umontreal.ca. However, > I can't get in at that address and can't find it at castor.iro.umontreal.ca. > > Does anyone on this list know where this journal is archived or how it > is listed at Univ. of Montreal?? > > Please respond to me at: patwm@uoknor.edu > > Thanks in advance. > > Pat Weaver-Meyers > Univ of Oklahoma > For the benefit of the whole list, let me say that Surfaces is available via anonymous ftp through harfang.cc.umontreal.ca or, more simply, through ftp.umontreal.ca. It is located in the Surfaces directory. Macintosh articles and ascii articles are available for volumes 1, 2 and on-going vol. 3. Gif graphics for the Escher article in vol 1 are also available. WordPerfect articles for DOS and Windows are presently under construction and will be availabel shortly. We may add PostScript but are a bit daunted by the size of the henerated files and the problems this raises for people who want to transfer such articles to their personal computer via a 2400 bps modem. So, for the moment, this alternative remains a mere hypothesis. Surfaces is a refereed journal, now in its third year of production, indexed in the MLA bibliography, offering formatted articles to its readers. Its philosophy is that knowledge is most efficiently validated by peer review, best distributed by electronic means, and best used if people can easily print what they really want to study (in contradistinction with browsing which can be done on screen) in a format that looks like an offprint. Gopher access is also available, in particular through CICnet. I hope this answers most initial questions people might have about Surfaces. I forgot to add that the articles and reviews in Surfaces deal mainly with cultural studies. Please write to me individually if you have further questions, comments or suggestions. And allow me to thank all of you for your interest in our electronic journal. I will be discussing it on amore theoretical level at the forthcoming Manitoba conference on refereed e-journals. Jean-Claude Guedon co-editor Surfaces guedon@ere.umontreal.ca ========================================================================= Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1993 08:11:38 EDT Reply-To: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> Sender: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> From: Norman Schmuff 443-9620 <schmuffn%fdacd.bitnet@vtbit.cc.vt.edu> Subject: FDA Electronic Submissions (CANDA) (sent simultaneously to several LISTS) Many options are currently being explored for electronic regulatory submission at the US Food and Drug Administration. These electronic documents are generally referred to as CANDAs (Computer Assisted New Drug Applications). One small project is underway, in conjunction with a few pharmaceutical firms, to prototype an electronic regulatory submission, based on non-proprietary file interchange formats. File formats will include SGML for text, and CGM for vectorized graphics. Other chemistry specific file formats being considered are: for chemical structure/reactions SMD, and MDL's MOLFILE; and for analytical instrument data netCDF and JCAMP. This project is largely modeled on those standards promoted by the Department of Defense in the CALS initiative. The project is currently restricted to a portion of the "Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls" (CMC) section. The first public showing will be 13 and 14 October in Philadelphia at a meeting sponsored by the Graphics Communication Association (GCA). For more information contact: Graphics Communication Association 100 Daingerfield Rd Alexandria, VA 22314-2867 703-519-8160, 703-548-8160 (FAX) Comments or suggestions on this specific project should be sent personally to me: schmuffn @ fdacd.bitnet (DO NOT REPLY DIRECTLY TO THIS LISTSERV MESSAGE WHICH WILL DISTRIBUTE YOUR REPLY TO _EVERYONE_ ON THIS LIST) I am particularly interested in stuff relating to chemistry related issues, like SGML markup for connection tables and ways to handle spectral and chromatographic data. Norman R. Schmuff, Ph.D. FDA, HFD-530 ========================================================================= Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1993 08:08:59 EDT Reply-To: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> Sender: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> From: Dieke van Wijnen <dieke.vanwijnen@wkap.nl> Subject: Software for generating citation complying to Vancouver style This morning I received a request from one of our authors I could not respond to and am wondering if one of you may have an answer: He is looking for computer reference management software which will facilitate compliance of their citation to Vancouver requirements. Are any of you aware of anything on the market like this? Please respond to me directly, thanks. Dieke van Wijnen Wolters Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands vanWijnen@WKAP.nl ========================================================================= Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1993 16:22:17 EDT Reply-To: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> Sender: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> From: Meckler Corporation <meckler@tigger.jvnc.net> Subject: Internet World Conf. INTERNET WORLD '93 and DOCUMENT DELIVERY WORLD '93 Conference and Exhibition Dealing with the Commercial and Non- Commcercial Utilization of these Services and the Impact they Have on Information Providers and Users December 6-9, 1993 Jacob Javits Convention Center, New York City Sponsored by Internet World Magazine and Document Delivery World Magazine, Meckler Corporation Conference Program Meckler has created workshops and seminars designed for professionals and end-users in several interest categories. You decide which workshops or seminars are right for you. There are 8 pre-conference workshops, 41 seminars and 4 post-conference workshops that address your specific needs. INTERNET WORLD '93 is unequaled in the industry. It is the only program built around the concept of the delivery of information on the Interent. Exhibit Hall Over 100 exhibitors will be showcasing a universe of the latest products, programs and services related to Internet utilization and electronic Document Delivery. You can explore the world of Internet by testing the "super electronic highway" at numerous hook-ups in our exhibit hall. INTERNET WORLD is the trade show for information and technology related to Internet services. Register now and begin your successful competition in the "information world" of tomorrow. Featured Topics Document Delivery and the Internet, Basics for small Institutions, Navigating the Net, Leasing & copyright, Government information on the Net, Getting connected, Market based global Libraries, Wireless access, Electronic texts, Doing business on the Internet, Cost justifying the Internet, NREN and publishers, Fax publishing, Publishing on the Internet, National Networks, Protocols and standards, Retrieval tools, Community networking Full conference (not including workshops): $325 One day registration: $165 Group registrations available Preconference and Postconference workshops available INTERNET WORLD '93 AND DOCUMENT DELIVERY WORLD '93 11 Ferry Lane West, Westport, CT 06880 Tel: 800-MECKLER (632-5537); 203-226-6967 Fax: 800-858-3144; 203-454-5840 E-mail: Internet: meckler @jvnc.net CompuServe: 70373,616; AppleLink: Meckler To receive a full conference program by mail, please send your mailing address to meckler@jvnc.net. To receive the program by email, respond to the same address. Subject line: IW 93 Conf. Thank you. Tony Abbott, meckler@jvnc.net ========================================================================= Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1993 08:28:45 EDT Reply-To: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> Sender: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> From: duxbury@sfu.ca Subject: On-screen editing references I work on a printed journal in the social sciences. Our editing is currently done on paper, and changes transferred to disk by a second individual. We find this very inefficient and time-consuming and are attempting to coax our copy editor into editing onscreen. Could you recommend any articles, guides, or stories to help her make this transition? In particular, she is concerned about how to track what has been done to files, and what is left to do, so that "almost ready" files aren't sent off in error. BTW, We are using MS Word 5.5 for the IBM. Thanks for any assistance you can offer. Nancy Duxbury duxbury@sfu.ca ========================================================================= Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1993 16:25:51 EDT Reply-To: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> Sender: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> From: steven cherry <stc@panix.com> Subject: Re: On-screen editing references In-Reply-To: <199309281249.AA25365@panix.com> > I work on a printed journal in the social sciences. Our editing is > currently done on paper, and changes transferred to disk by a second > individual. We find this very inefficient and time-consuming and are > attempting to coax our copy editor into editing onscreen. > > Could you recommend any articles, guides, or stories to help her make > this transition? In particular, she is concerned about how to track > what has been done to files, and what is left to do, so that "almost > ready" files aren't sent off in error. > > BTW, We are using MS Word 5.5 for the IBM. I'm not sure I understand the copyeditor's concerns here, though there are others (concerns that is). How does she keep track of copyedits on paper? One can see which edits have been made, but not which ones have not been! The main concern we have had has had nothing to do with the copyeditor per se, it's how to track edits on our end, and the author's. What kind of audit trail is there so that a mistake found in blue lines (for example) can be traced back to the copyeditor, as opposed to the author or, more likely, the typesetter. For this we have started to use the redline facilities of Xywrite (though WordPerfect, and other word processors have them, and there are dedicated redline packages, such as Red Pencil, as well). Ultimately, for some journals at least, we will be copyediting them in-house (which we are not doing now by and large) as well as typesetting them in-house (which we are doing with a number of journals, a number which will continue to increase). At that point, tracking will be largely of interest only to the inter-departmental finger-pointers, and we will probably let the author fend for himself figuring out what changes have been made by the copyeditor (he or she will have the original ms., and the page proof, but no intermediate copyedited ms. or red-line printout). -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Steven Cherry, Manager, Publishing Technologies Elsevier Science Publishing, 655 Sixth Ave New York NY 10010 212/633-3858/w 212/633-3797/f stc@panix.com ========================================================================= Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1993 16:26:14 EDT Reply-To: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> Sender: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> From: IAN.WORTHINGTON@classics.utas.edu.au Subject: *ELECTRONIC ANTIQUITY* 1, 4 *ELECTRONIC ANTIQUITY: COMMUNICATING THE CLASSICS* As a subscriber to the electronic journal you are being contacted to let you know that Volume 1 Issue 4 (September 1993) is now available for access. The contents follow. *ELECTRONIC ANTIQUITY: COMMUNICATING THE CLASSICS* ISSN 1320-3606 Peter Toohey (Founding Editor) Ian Worthington (Editor) VOL. 1 ISSUE 4 - SEPTEMBER 1993 (01) LIST OF CONTENTS (02) EDITORIAL (03) GUIDELINES FOR CONTRIBUTORS (04) ARTICLES Becker, Andrew S., 'A Short Essay on Deconstruction and Plato's *Ion*' Economou, Maria, 'Euesperides: A Devastated Site' Morse, M., 'On the Utility of Classical Etymology for Sociology' Thompson, L., 'Roman Perceptions of Blacks' (05) OBLOQUY Keen, Tony, Aristophanes' *Lysistrata* (to Sallie R. Goetsch, *EA* 1,3, August 1993) Goetsch, Sallie R., Aristophanes' *Lysistrata*: A Reply to Tony Keen (06) POETRY Baker, Robert J., 'Panting for God. A Version of Prudentius, *Peristephanon* Liber 3' Wilson, Lyn, 'Ulysses, A Butterfly' (07) J. PAUL GETTY MUSEUM by Kenneth Hamma Recent Acquisitions and Lectures (08) *SCHOLIA* Editorial note and contents for Volume 2 (1994) Supplied by Bill Dominik (09) CONFERENCES The Greek and Roman Book, University of Minnesota (programme) The Horace Bimillennium, UCLA (Programme) (10) VACANCIES AUSTRALIA: Classicist: University of Melbourne U.S.A.: Archaeologist (2 posts): Bryn Mawr College Archaeologist: Oriental Institute, Chicago (11) KEEPING IN TOUCH Electronic Forums & Repositories for the Classics by Ian Worthington *Electronic Antiquity* Vol. 1 Issue 4 - September 1993 edited by Peter Toohey and Ian Worthington antiquity-editor@classics.utas.edu.au ISSN 1320-3606 ------------------------ A general announcement (aimed at non-subscribers) that the journal is available will be made in approximately 12 hours time over the lists - as a subscriber you will be automatically contacted in advance when future issues are available. Access is via gopher or ftp (instructions below). Volume 1 Issue 5 will be published in October. The editors welcome contributions. HOW TO ACCESS Access is via gopher or ftp. The journal file name of this issue is 1,4-September1993; Volume 1 Issues 1-3 may also be accessed in the same way. GOPHER: -- info.utas.edu.au and through gopher: -- open top level document called Publications -- open Electronic Antiquity. -- open 1,4-September1993 -- open (01)contents first for list of contents, then other files as appropriate FTP: -- FTP.utas.edu.au (or ftp.info.utas.edu.au) --> departments --> classics --> antiquity. -- In Antiquity you will see the files as described above. Since a few people had problems accessing the journal via ftp, here are the stages in more detail: at your system prompt: FTP at the subsequent prompt: open FTP.utas.edu.au at login prompt: anonymous at password: your username (which won't show) then: cd departments then: cd classics then: cd antiquity then: ls -l then: cd 1,4-September1993 then: ls -l You will now have a list of the various directories (the 'd' beginning each line 'drwx....' indicates you're dealing with a directory) then: cd (into whichever directory you want) then: ls -l If the first character in the line is not 'd', you've got a file. Use the 'get' command plus the file name to download. If you're still in a directory, use the 'ls-l' command to list its contents. Use 'get' to transfer files. To move back up the directory tree: type: cdup then: ls -l And repeat the process. If still having trouble, try, once you have the directory list for the journal: Type (for example) cd (04)Articles Your response should be 'CWD command successful', but no list. Type ls-l Your response should be a list of fours articles in a form such as: -rw-rw-r--1 1689 77030 Sep 28 23:09 Becker-Plato etc for the rest Type get Becker-Plato and you should have a copy. A final alternative if a space is magically inserted in the parenthesis of the file number (e.g. of 'Articles' file) is to specify: CD ./(04)Articles Please also be very careful when ftping *not* to leave *any* spaces in file names or make typos. Do NOT use Telnet. The best way to access the journal (in terms of both ease and time) is by gopher, and we would urge you to do so. The structure of the journal is also more easily recognisable on gopher. Please try to access *here* in Tasmania (eastern Australian time) either during the night, very early morning or at weekends, since during the business day the lines are crammed. This means you'll need to check with (e.g.) the international operator for the right time difference, but at the moment (the following is not an exhaustive list) Britain is 9 hours behind eastern Australia; Europe, west to east, 8-6 hours; East Coast U.S.A. 14 hours; West Coast U.S.A. 17 hours; South America, coastal to eastern, 13-15 hours, South Africa 8 hours; Singapore 2 hours; and Japan 1 hour. Queries and contributions may be directed to the editors at :antiquity-editor@classics.utas.edu.au. Peter Toohey (ptoohey@metz.une.edu.au) Ian Worthington (ian.worthington@classics.utas.edu.au) (end) --------- Ian Worthington, Department of Classics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia. Tel. (002) 202294 (direct) Fax (002) 202186 e-mail: Ian.Worthington@classics.utas.edu.au ========================================================================= Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1993 16:26:39 EDT Reply-To: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> Sender: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> From: Lee Jaffe <jaffe@scilibx.ucsc.edu> Subject: Re: On-screen editing references In-Reply-To: (null) I'd like to argue on your copy editor's behalf. I don't think there is any reason that all the work has to stay in the electronic environment. And there are still a lot of good reasons for making a printout and taking the copy over to a corner somewhere. Think of it like a painter backing away from the easel to get a different view of the canvas. On the other hand, I would argue is that once the copy editor has finished making the changes on the paper copy, s/he should be responsible for entering the revisions on the word processor. The computer is the work environment and s/he should be responsible for producing copy that the others use. -- Lee Jaffe, UC Santa Cruz On Tue, 28 Sep 1993 duxbury@sfu.ca wrote: > I work on a printed journal in the social sciences. Our editing is > currently done on paper, and changes transferred to disk by a second > individual. We find this very inefficient and time-consuming and are > attempting to coax our copy editor into editing onscreen. > > Could you recommend any articles, guides, or stories to help her make > this transition? In particular, she is concerned about how to track > what has been done to files, and what is left to do, so that "almost > ready" files aren't sent off in error. > > BTW, We are using MS Word 5.5 for the IBM. > > Thanks for any assistance you can offer. > > Nancy Duxbury > duxbury@sfu.ca ========================================================================= Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1993 08:17:00 EDT Reply-To: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> Sender: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> From: james w williams <jww4@midway.uchicago.edu> Subject: onscreen editing I'd like to join in the discussion about the benefits of copyediting onscreen. It seems to me that that even with redlining (or similar program) the sticking point is dealing with the author. To make the process work at its most efficient, one would get a disk, edit onscreen, and send the disk to the author, who would then read and edit on disk, and send the disk back. The editor would clean up and send the disk to the compositor. Editor and author would be responsible for keeping hardcopy at all stages, but no one would be forced to transfer changes from hardcopy to disk. However, the author has to be ready to work this way, and so far -- at least in my area of the humanities (I edit a humanities quarterly) -- one or two authors per issue, if that many, are capable, willing, or able -- that is, home with their computer when they get the copyedited manuscript -- to work onscreen. In other words, editors are more uptodate than authors The question is then is it worth it to do any copyediting onscreen? It saves money for the press on composing costs, but I don't see any way around having somebody in the editorial office typing changes in a manuscript into an electronic file. So I agree with Lee Jaffe's comments on both counts -- the editor should be responsible for the typing, and there sure seems to getting around the use of hardcopy manuscripts. However, I am definitely looking for a way out of hardcopy editing. jay williams university of chicago press jww4@midway.uchicago.edu ========================================================================= Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1993 10:45:15 EDT Reply-To: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> Sender: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> From: steven cherry <stc@panix.com> Subject: Re: onscreen editing In-Reply-To: <199309291228.AA22449@panix.com> On Wed, 29 Sep 1993, james w williams wrote: > I'd like to join in the discussion about the benefits of copyediting > onscreen. It seems to me that that even with redlining (or similar program) > the sticking point is dealing with the author. To make the process work at > its most efficient, one would get a disk, edit onscreen, and send the disk to > the author, who would then read and edit on disk, and send the disk back. The > editor would clean up and send the disk to the compositor. Editor and author > would be responsible for keeping hardcopy at all stages, but no one would be > forced to transfer changes from hardcopy to disk. However, the author has to > be ready to work this way, and so far -- at least in my area of the > humanities (I edit a humanities quarterly) -- one or two authors per issue, > if that many, are capable, willing, or able -- that is, home with their > computer when they get the copyedited manuscript -- to work onscreen. In > other words, editors are more uptodate than authors I think from the point of view of the publisher, this would be a disaster. At least it would be for us here. Perhaps it would work in books (though I have my doubts), but for journals it couldn't possibly. The first problem is it would devastate the schedule. Second, you would be leaving the journal editor out of the loop at a crucial editing stage. Third, there are logistical problems (disk and file formats, tracking, etc.) that are not worth the effort. Then there is the expense of this additional work. Finally, and most importantly, for us, the copyeditor does the coding. I'm sorry, but I cannot allow an author to muck around with a file once it has been coded, and if the copyeditor has to recheck the file once the author has mucked around, this is too much time and effort. All this bother to save the production editor a little time in the correction stage? Or save the compositor (us, for most of our journals we receive diskettes for) an hour or two to enter changes for an entire issue? And remember, some corrections are composition-related, not text-based. There is no way the copyeditor could know how to make these changes, so we have to go through the file anyway as compositors, and in some cases undo things the copyeditor had done. I don't want to sound harsh, but I simply cannot imagine how this works, and the more I think about it, the more my imagination fails. Perhaps with a different workflow, I'd be able to picture it, but on ours, which more or less corresponds to the traditional one, I can't. By traditional workflow, I mean, - acceptance, - copyediting, - composition (page proof), - review (proofreader, author, journal editor, production editor; coallated by the production editor), - composition and final corrections (repro). -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Steven Cherry, Manager, Publishing Technologies Elsevier Science Publishing, 655 Sixth Ave New York NY 10010 212/633-3858/w 212/633-3797/f stc@panix.com ========================================================================= Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1993 10:45:41 EDT Reply-To: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> Sender: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> From: Darren McKewen <dmckewen@bna.com> Subject: Re: Editing Electronic References Regarding the discussion of copy editors doing their work on electronic files versus hard copy, my experience is that the nature of the work and the nature of the writer dictates which method is best. I edit reference material written by staff writers within our company as well as submissions from outside authors. In general, it is fastest and perhaps most efficient to do my edits on electronic copy, allow the writer to see the revised copy and catch any errors I might have introduced and argue over changes I've made, then put the copy through for formatting and proofing. However, editing on hard copy and having the writer put in the changes can serve a useful training function when working with staff writers our outsiders who will be contributing regularly. It takes more time at the outset, but can save time and grief in the long run. A minor example: If I change the word "Corporation" to "Corp." (to meet style guidelines) on paper, and the writer puts in the change, he or she will quickly learn to write "Corp." In contrast, if I edit a computer file, the author reviewing my changes is unlikely to notice this point. Week after week, the same mistake will be made and I will make the same change. This can be even more important regarding tagging. Our staff authors do most of the SGML tagging for the material they prepare; only by having to make necessary changes themselves will they learn the tagging scheme. When editing for structure, electronic editing simply cannot (yet) match the impact or clarity of circling sections and marking with arrows to show how material should be restructured. While it might be easier to do the changes myself, authors will not see as clearly how material has been moved around. Seeing those football-play-diagrams on paper, authors have a better concept of how to organize information in the future. By and large, I hasten to add, the above points would not be relevant when dealing with outside authors. It would be a waste of time to send material back to them for rekeying, and most would likely rebel at being told to add a comma here and capitalize a name there. ========================================================================= Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1993 16:52:59 EDT Reply-To: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> Sender: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> From: "Ian C.Nelson, Univ. of Sask. Library" <nelson@sklib.usask.ca> Subject: Re: onscreen editing jay williams, university of chicago press, said: : To make the process work at : its most efficient, one would get a disk, edit onscreen, and send the disk to : the author, who would then read and edit on disk, and send the disk back. The : Would it not be even more efficient for editor and author to agree to the use of a common word processor (with the redlining feature) and to do at least the initial exchanges (at the word processing stage) electronically by sending binary files which each could read and edit in the common format? Ian C. Nelson Nelson@sklib.usask.ca ========================================================================= Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1993 16:53:20 EDT Reply-To: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> Sender: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> From: helfrich@siam.org Subject: Onscreen Editing Onscreen editing is a problem with which we are now wrestling. Currently, for author-provided files, we do all our editing on hardcopy and the hardcopy is given to our in-house composition specialist or a freelance supplier. We use TeX, and our copy editors are not trained in its use yet. We will train them when we have a WYSIWYG system. I have done onscreen editing of TeX manuscripts, and I must confess that I didn't like it; it seemed less efficient to me given the nature of the program. It's almost impossible to spot format problems without a WYSIWYG system. In the early days of our use of TeX, we did ask the authors to make all editorial and format changes. This, as you can imagine, did not go over well. Now that we have an in-house composition department, the use of TeX has risen dramatically. We still checked hardcopy of the file after it was returned from the author. Logistically, it was a nightmare. Since we had to rely so much on the authors, our schedules got mucked up, too. Our main problem is being able to indicate to authors what changes have been made. In a highly technical manuscript, even the slightest error introduced by the copy editor could result in an errata. Our authors do pay attention to the changes that we make; we must be able to continue to show them what they are. By the same token, sending electronic galley proofs poses problems for us. We are responsible for ensuring that the paper that was accepted is not essentially changed during the production process (substantial changes require a second review by the editor who accepted the paper). We do trust our authors, but we also must be able to ascertain at a glance what type of changes have been made at the galley stage. Laura B. Helfrich Managing Editor Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics ========================================================================= Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1993 16:55:02 EDT Reply-To: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> Sender: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> From: Margaret E Sokolik <msokolik@uclink.berkeley.edu> Subject: ISSN/query I have the ISSN form sitting before me; and two blanks challenge me--I'd like to hear how anyone else in a similar situation dealt with it. We are an e-j without professional association, although we are refereed, academic, etc. I have to fill in "Publisher" and "Subscription Address". Did you use an e-mail address or a postal address for subscriptions? Who did you name as publisher, if you didn't have the backing of a pub. company or professional association? Maggi Sokolik, Editor TESL-EJ UC Berkeley ========================================================================= Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1993 16:55:21 EDT Reply-To: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> Sender: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> From: "Michael R. Boudreau" <boudreau@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> Subject: Re: onscreen editing James Williams is right that authors are often neither willing nor able to deal with their copyedited manuscripts on disk, but this is not an obstacle to the copy editor's ability to work on disk. Programs with redlining features, such as XyWrite III+, allow the copy editor to mark text that should be inserted or deleted, and then create a printout with all this work visible on the hard copy--insertions in boldface and between braces, and deletions overstruck. The author can mark up this hard copy and send it back to the copy editor, who can then make the final changes on disk. XyWrite (this is the only such program I know, and I wish I knew of one for the Mac instead of the PC) also has a feature that allows you to then make permanent all the redlining at once, or on a case-by-case basis. --Mike Boudreau University of Illinois Press ========================================================================= Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1993 08:08:22 EDT Reply-To: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> Sender: "Publishing E-Journals : Publishing, Archiving, and Access" <vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> From: James O'Donnell <jod@ccat.sas.upenn.edu> Subject: Re: ISSN/query In-Reply-To: <9309292100.AA09755@mail.sas.upenn.edu> from "Margaret E Sokolik" at Sep 29, 93 04:55:02 pm As e-editor of several related journals (Bryn Mawr Reviews, etc.), I have filled out that form several times. For "publisher" I put the name of the journal, for "address" I put the relevant mailing address (where they will send the form back to with ISSN). The more interesting question is how to supply both sample and depository copies, and where I have left it with them after interesting e-mail was taht if and as they had a way of receiving such things in e- form I would gladly supply them! Jim O'Donnell U. of Pennsylvania </jod@ccat.sas.upenn.edu></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></boudreau@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></msokolik@uclink.berkeley.edu></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></nelson@sklib.usask.ca></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></dmckewen@bna.com></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></stc@panix.com></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></jww4@midway.uchicago.edu></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></jaffe@scilibx.ucsc.edu></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></stc@panix.com></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></meckler@tigger.jvnc.net></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></dieke.vanwijnen@wkap.nl></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></schmuffn%fdacd.bitnet@vtbit.cc.vt.edu></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></guedon@ere.umontreal.ca></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></qb1211@uokmvsa.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></paulie@echonyc.com></tdarcos@mcimail.com></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet> </drobison@library.berkeley.edu></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></kingh@snysyrv1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet></vpiej-l@vtvm1.bitnet>
__________________________________________________________________
James Powell